Connect with us

Politics

In Defence of Justice Forum, Tinubu’s Strongest Political Ally- Adeola Al-Amin

Published

on

 

 

I have to come to bury Caesar not to praise him, the evil that men do, live after them

– Marcus Brutus in Williams Shakespeare’s Julius Ceaser

 

The above quote from one of the most popular of Williams Shakespeare’s works forms the basis of my writing this article.

For me, I owe it a point of duty to put the record straight at all, particularly for the new generation popularly called the GenZ generation who may have been swayed by the lies and misrepresentation of facts by ignorant people posing as public analysts on the Lagos political landscape.

In recent time, the major source of discussion in Lagos politics was the removal of Mudashiru Obasa as the Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly.

I’m neither a politician nor a member of the Assembly, I am just a public analyst, who possess deep knowledge of the political activities and its players particularly since the current political dispensation birthed in 1998.

Accusing fingers were pointed at perceived orchestrators of the removal but what came to me as very awkward and unbelievable was the allegation that some politicians are planning to take over Lagos from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu with the members and leaders of the referred Justice Forum at the receiving end of abuse, vilification and outright lies.

For the sake of this particular article, I have come to put the record straight, not to praise leaders and elders Justice Forum.

The need to put the record straight is essential, particularly with a particular social media content Creator going on video to lie and present fallacies as facts.

With my knowledge of Lagos politics, it would be very difficult and unfortunate to make Justice Forum, its leaders and members scapegoat for what happened in the House of Assembly.

For emphasis sake, the members have insisted that what happened was their internal affair which not a few agreed with them that they have the right to conduct the affair of the Assembly in accordance with the rules.

For the avoidance of doubt, this writer personally believes and agrees with many that Justice Forum is a honest organisation peopled by leaders who have been tested, trusted and have always delivered on their assignments with dignity, honesty and transparency.

It remains the biggest and most influential political group within the All Progressives Congress (APC). Let us be clear, Justice Forum gave birth to all other groups due to the growth of our great party. As such, it will be a fallacy to conclude that Justice Forum will and can seek any discord within APC. It will not happen.

Over the years, the group, its leaders, elders and members have been guided by the motto of the group, Truth Shall Always Prevail, and my interactions with others have proven that they have not waivered from this path of truth and honesty.

It is important to note that when lies continue to spread like wildfire, they are sometimes taken as truth, hence the need to put set the record straight and put a lie to the wicked rumours being spread about the organisation.

Justice Forum has always been and will remain a solid rock of support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, that is sacrosanct in motto and belief.

Thus, the ridiculous statements by some paid agents that the leadership of JF is seeking to betray and reduce the influence of President Tinubu in Lagos is a wicked lie from the pit of the most brutal part of hell.

The lie which started gaining ground through the vituperation of a hired social media charlatan against leaders of the groip therefore, calls for urgent reaction and need to clear the smear campaign.

To put the record straight and for the umpteenth time, neither leaders nor members of Justice Forum were involved in the removal of Rt. Honourable Obasa.

The Lawmakers treated the issue as an internal one among themselves, hence, linking the removal to the Justice Forum is absolute nonsense and a terrible fallacy.

The content Creator and his ilks have raised many unsubstantiated allegations against the Justice Forum and their leaders including outright lies in their presentations.

It is absurd and unheard of to accuse JF leaders of betraying Tinubu or accuse them of working against the President. A deeper investigation into their background revealed a bunch of people, ignorant of past events and history of political movements in Lagos and Nigeria.

It is pertinent to state here that President Tinubu is a founding member of Justice Forum which was formed in protest against the decision of Chief Dapo Sarumi to take up appointment with the Interim National Government (ING).

The group, aligned with other pro-democracy groups particularly, Afenifere and NADECO, to fight for the actualisation of June 12 mandate of the late Chief MKO Abiola and it is on record that no leader of the group participated in the transition programme of the military administration of late General Sani Abacha.

When General AbdulSalami Abubakar heralded new transition programme, Justice Forum, aligned with the decision of the NADECO and Afenifere to participate in the programme which culminated in its being one of the major foundation groups of the Alliance for Democracy (AD).

When President Tinubu returned to Nigeria in 1998, he found a natural habitat in Justice Forum and renewed his long-term membership of the group and relationship with the leaders. It is the Justice Forum that provided the platform for him to launch his governorship aspiration in 1998.

In actual fact, Justice Forum was the first group to publicly endorse the aspiration of President Tinubu. His adoption was announced at a meeting in the house of Late Oba Mufutau Hamzat in Yaya Abatan area of Ogba, and it was him and the late Chief Mumuni Adio Badmus who raised his hand on that day along with some other leaders.

It should be noted that during the imbroglio that greeted the Lagos AD gubernatorial primaries in 1998 which pitted President Tinubu against the late Funsho Williams, the Justice Forum members and their leaders stood solidly behind the President, they were never shaky in their support, they mobilised their members to not only participate in the primaries but also to vote massively for President Tinubu.

It should be noted firmly here that then, some leaders who are now pushing the negative narrative out not only supported the late Funsho Williams, they voted for him and tried all they could to truncate Tinubu’s victory during the primaries.

Many still remember the roles one of them played when he was a Minister by trying to undermine and truncate the administration of Bola Ahmed Tinubu as Governor of Lagos State. Another was the Chairman of the Network Alliance, Funsho William’s political group while another simply rebuffed all entreaties made by then AD Governorship aspirant, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, to join his group.

Over the years, President Tinubu has always enjoyed the support and encouragement of the leaders and elders of Justice Forum.

When he was leaving office in 2007, there was a succession crisis but the Justice Forum leaders stood solidly behind the President. They aligned with his choice of candidate. Tola Kasali was first presented as his preferred candidate, the leaders queued behind him, when the baton change to Babatunde Raji Fashola, SAN, the leaders naturally switched their support for him.

When Fashola was living office and another succession crisis reared its head, and President Tinubu settled for Akinwunmi Ambode, the Justice Forum leaders queued up behind Ambode even though one of the sons of their leader was contesting for the same position. As the Chairman of the Lagos APC then and staunch member of JF, Chief Henry Oladele Ajomale never used his position to favour Kadir Obafemi Hamzat, son of the leader of his group.

The same process played out during the selection of Babajide Olusola Sanwo-Olu, the choice of their leader, President Tinubu.

When Tinubu decided to run for the Presidency of the country, the leaders of Justice Forum, not only supported him, they were on the road with him throughout the length and breadth of the country during his consultation tour.

Since he became President of Nigeria, Justice Forum leaders have not slacked. They have remain resolute in their support for him and keeping him abreast of events going on in Lagos.

Justice Forum will continue to uphold truth, advocate for peace and tranquility among Nigerians and will not relent in their support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR.

The naysayers and the social media charlatan actually ranted against the president then. We know that money buy people’s conscience not people at Justice Forum. These sets of people should find other jobs to do rather than spreading rumours and lies to cause disaffection between the President and his people. Posterity will be unkind to those whose only action is to cause discord in the society.

Once again, I want to re-emphasise that I came to set the record straight but not to praise Justice Forum.

Adeola Al-Amin is a public affairs analyst and is based in Lagos

Economy

Hon Orekoya Appreciates Somolu Residents After Winning Fresh Mandate

Published

on

Somolu

Hon Orekoya Somolu reelection mandate sees Lagos lawmaker thank residents after victory, promising improved service delivery and development

(more…)

73 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Politics

Bauchi APC in Crisis: How a Governorship Primary Became a Political Powder Keg

Published

on

By

By Adebayo Adeoye

All is clearly not well within the ranks of the All Progressives Congress in Bauchi State. What should have been a defining moment for party unity and strategic positioning ahead of the 2027 elections has instead deepened mistrust, widened internal divisions and exposed dangerous cracks within the party. For an opposition party still struggling to regain political momentum in one of Nigeria’s most competitive states, the timing could hardly be worse. Rather than serving as a launchpad for renewed ambition, the governorship primary has become a stark reflection of the APC’s internal dysfunction — one that could shape its political fortunes long before voters head to the polls.

The so called Last Friday’s governorship primary, which produced former Governor Mohammed Abubakar as candidate, was expected to rally party faithful around a credible challenger for 2027. Instead, it has triggered widespread controversy and bitter reactions across the party. What ought to have strengthened internal cohesion has, in many quarters, been condemned as deeply flawed, opaque and lacking the transparency required to inspire confidence among party members. Allegations of backroom deals, imposed outcomes and the sidelining of longstanding stakeholders have rapidly evolved from whispers into open accusations the party leadership can no longer ignore. The resulting credibility crisis is not merely reputational; it strikes at the institutional foundations necessary for any serious electoral campaign.

For many observers and loyal party members, the exercise represented more than a routine internal contest. It was a test of the APC’s democratic credentials and its readiness to reposition itself after years of electoral setbacks in Bauchi. The party had a rare opportunity to demonstrate discipline, inclusiveness and a genuine commitment to internal democracy. It had the chance to show voters that it had learned from past mistakes and was prepared to offer a coherent alternative to the ruling Peoples Democratic Party. Instead, the primary has left many supporters frustrated, alienated and uncertain about the party’s direction. What should have united the APC has instead pushed it closer to fragmentation.

Concerns continue to grow over what critics describe as the complete absence of participatory democracy in favour of a forced consensus process. These concerns were reinforced by comments attributed to the endorsed candidate, Mohammed Abubakar, and by the controversial declaration of results announced by retired AIG John Abang, which many party stakeholders insist reflected a predetermined outcome rather than a credible electoral exercise.

The grievances extend far beyond the immediate contestants and their campaign teams. Ward officials, delegates and grassroots mobilisers — the very backbone of electoral politics in Nigeria — feel sidelined and betrayed after investing time, loyalty and resources into a process they believe disregarded their voices. These are the individuals who organise communities, mobilise voters and translate party messaging into electoral support. When such actors lose faith in the process, the consequences are rarely passive. In closely contested political environments like Bauchi, disillusionment at the grassroots can prove decisive.

The broader political context makes the crisis even more consequential. Bauchi has long been a battleground state where power has alternated between the APC and the PDP. Governor Bala Mohammed has significantly consolidated the PDP’s political networks and influence across the state. Against that backdrop, the APC’s most realistic path to electoral competitiveness in 2027 depended on presenting a united front, a credible candidate and a compelling alternative vision. The governorship primary was therefore not just an internal exercise; it was a strategic moment capable of defining the party’s electoral future. Instead, it has handed the ruling party an early political advantage.

More troubling still is the growing fear that unresolved grievances could trigger defections, weaken party cohesion and embolden rival political forces ahead of 2027. Nigerian political history repeatedly shows that opposition parties rarely succeed when consumed by internal divisions and leadership disputes. In many cases, electoral defeats stem less from the popularity of opponents than from unresolved internal crises allowed to fester unchecked. Bauchi itself has witnessed this pattern before, and the APC now risks repeating it.

Indeed, the party faces one of its most consequential internal tests in recent years. Influential figures across the state are reportedly disenchanted with both the outcome of the primary and the manner in which it was conducted. Quiet consultations outside official party structures have already begun — often an early sign of possible realignments. In several local governments, ward executives are said to be demoralised and uncertain about committing themselves to a process they no longer trust. If left unresolved, the fallout could cripple grassroots mobilisation, weaken fundraising efforts and push influential stakeholders toward strategic defections, political abstention or alternative alliances.

For a party serious about reclaiming political relevance in Bauchi, unity cannot remain a slogan recited at press conferences while the conditions necessary for unity are undermined in practice. Reconciliation, dialogue and genuine inclusion must now become urgent priorities. That requires more than symbolic appeals for calm. It demands credible engagement with aggrieved aspirants, delegates and grassroots structures. It requires transparent mechanisms for addressing grievances and accountability for actions that have left the party more divided than before the primary.

The 2027 election is approaching quickly, and time is not on the APC’s side. The window for reconciliation and political recovery remains open, but not indefinitely. The party must now make a clear choice: unity with all its difficult compromises, or division with all its predictable consequences.

47 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Politics

Araraume’s victory at the APC senatorial primary election: A resurgence of political structure in Imo North

Published

on

Araraume

Senator Ifeanyi Araraume records a landslide Araraume Imo APC primary victory across Imo North wards in a decisive party contest (more…)

74 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Trending News