Connect with us

Politics

Governor Dauda Lawal’s Security Efforts in Zamfara Yield Positive Results, GDL Media Force Defends

Published

on

Dauda Lawal

GDL Media Force responds to critics, highlighting Governor Dauda Lawal’s strategic security investments, drones, APCs, and community guards that improve safety in Zamfara State

GDL Media Force and supporters of the Dauda Lawal-led administration have responded to recent criticisms by the so-called Zamfara Good Governance Forum, which falsely labelled the Governor’s security efforts as a “total failure.”

Also read: FCCPC: Tell us, is air travel also not for the poor?

Since taking office, Governor Dauda Lawal has prioritized tackling insecurity in Zamfara State through transparency, decisive action, and strategic investments.

Unlike previous administrations that negotiated with non-state actors, Lawal has opted for a proactive approach.

Key initiatives include:

  • Procurement of heavy security assets: 25 Armoured Personnel Carriers (APCs) and an 80-meter endurance surveillance drone capable of 8-hour continuous operations over 50 kilometres.
  • Community Protection Guards: Operationalized under the law with 60 new Hilux vehicles and specialised motorcycles.
  • Support for mainstream security agencies: Distribution of 150 Hilux vehicles to the Nigeria Police, DSS, NSCDC, and 20 Toyota Buffalo vehicles.
  • Zamfara State Security Trust Fund: Provides a predictable framework for funding security operations.

The Defence Minister praised these investments, noting that continued efforts could transform Zamfara into a model of security in the North-West.

The Governor’s prompt response to incidents, including the February 19 attack in Anka LGA, demonstrates his commitment to safeguarding lives and property.

GDL Media Force also highlighted the political bias behind criticisms. The so-called Zamfara Good Governance Forum has historically launched partisan attacks, often aligning with the political interests of former Governor Bello Matawalle.

Despite limited federal support and political isolation, Governor Lawal has sustained security operations while managing inherited debts of N1.2 billion.

The media group emphasized that security improvements are visible to residents, with Zamfara now on a path to lasting peace.

Also read: FCCPC: Tell us, is air travel also not for the poor?

“Governor Dauda Lawal remains focused, undeterred, and absolutely committed to restoring full normalcy to every inch of Zamfara State,” the statement concluded.

74 / 100 SEO Score

News

Ayodele Quits PRP After Exclusion From Presidential Aspirants List

Published

on

PRP

Ayodele Quits PRP Presidential Aspirants List after Prof. Oluwamuyiwa Favour Ayodele resigns over exclusion from PRP cleared candidates list

(more…)

66 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Economy

Hon Orekoya Appreciates Somolu Residents After Winning Fresh Mandate

Published

on

Somolu

Hon Orekoya Somolu reelection mandate sees Lagos lawmaker thank residents after victory, promising improved service delivery and development

(more…)

73 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Politics

Bauchi APC in Crisis: How a Governorship Primary Became a Political Powder Keg

Published

on

By

By Adebayo Adeoye

All is clearly not well within the ranks of the All Progressives Congress in Bauchi State. What should have been a defining moment for party unity and strategic positioning ahead of the 2027 elections has instead deepened mistrust, widened internal divisions and exposed dangerous cracks within the party. For an opposition party still struggling to regain political momentum in one of Nigeria’s most competitive states, the timing could hardly be worse. Rather than serving as a launchpad for renewed ambition, the governorship primary has become a stark reflection of the APC’s internal dysfunction — one that could shape its political fortunes long before voters head to the polls.

The so called Last Friday’s governorship primary, which produced former Governor Mohammed Abubakar as candidate, was expected to rally party faithful around a credible challenger for 2027. Instead, it has triggered widespread controversy and bitter reactions across the party. What ought to have strengthened internal cohesion has, in many quarters, been condemned as deeply flawed, opaque and lacking the transparency required to inspire confidence among party members. Allegations of backroom deals, imposed outcomes and the sidelining of longstanding stakeholders have rapidly evolved from whispers into open accusations the party leadership can no longer ignore. The resulting credibility crisis is not merely reputational; it strikes at the institutional foundations necessary for any serious electoral campaign.

For many observers and loyal party members, the exercise represented more than a routine internal contest. It was a test of the APC’s democratic credentials and its readiness to reposition itself after years of electoral setbacks in Bauchi. The party had a rare opportunity to demonstrate discipline, inclusiveness and a genuine commitment to internal democracy. It had the chance to show voters that it had learned from past mistakes and was prepared to offer a coherent alternative to the ruling Peoples Democratic Party. Instead, the primary has left many supporters frustrated, alienated and uncertain about the party’s direction. What should have united the APC has instead pushed it closer to fragmentation.

Concerns continue to grow over what critics describe as the complete absence of participatory democracy in favour of a forced consensus process. These concerns were reinforced by comments attributed to the endorsed candidate, Mohammed Abubakar, and by the controversial declaration of results announced by retired AIG John Abang, which many party stakeholders insist reflected a predetermined outcome rather than a credible electoral exercise.

The grievances extend far beyond the immediate contestants and their campaign teams. Ward officials, delegates and grassroots mobilisers — the very backbone of electoral politics in Nigeria — feel sidelined and betrayed after investing time, loyalty and resources into a process they believe disregarded their voices. These are the individuals who organise communities, mobilise voters and translate party messaging into electoral support. When such actors lose faith in the process, the consequences are rarely passive. In closely contested political environments like Bauchi, disillusionment at the grassroots can prove decisive.

The broader political context makes the crisis even more consequential. Bauchi has long been a battleground state where power has alternated between the APC and the PDP. Governor Bala Mohammed has significantly consolidated the PDP’s political networks and influence across the state. Against that backdrop, the APC’s most realistic path to electoral competitiveness in 2027 depended on presenting a united front, a credible candidate and a compelling alternative vision. The governorship primary was therefore not just an internal exercise; it was a strategic moment capable of defining the party’s electoral future. Instead, it has handed the ruling party an early political advantage.

More troubling still is the growing fear that unresolved grievances could trigger defections, weaken party cohesion and embolden rival political forces ahead of 2027. Nigerian political history repeatedly shows that opposition parties rarely succeed when consumed by internal divisions and leadership disputes. In many cases, electoral defeats stem less from the popularity of opponents than from unresolved internal crises allowed to fester unchecked. Bauchi itself has witnessed this pattern before, and the APC now risks repeating it.

Indeed, the party faces one of its most consequential internal tests in recent years. Influential figures across the state are reportedly disenchanted with both the outcome of the primary and the manner in which it was conducted. Quiet consultations outside official party structures have already begun — often an early sign of possible realignments. In several local governments, ward executives are said to be demoralised and uncertain about committing themselves to a process they no longer trust. If left unresolved, the fallout could cripple grassroots mobilisation, weaken fundraising efforts and push influential stakeholders toward strategic defections, political abstention or alternative alliances.

For a party serious about reclaiming political relevance in Bauchi, unity cannot remain a slogan recited at press conferences while the conditions necessary for unity are undermined in practice. Reconciliation, dialogue and genuine inclusion must now become urgent priorities. That requires more than symbolic appeals for calm. It demands credible engagement with aggrieved aspirants, delegates and grassroots structures. It requires transparent mechanisms for addressing grievances and accountability for actions that have left the party more divided than before the primary.

The 2027 election is approaching quickly, and time is not on the APC’s side. The window for reconciliation and political recovery remains open, but not indefinitely. The party must now make a clear choice: unity with all its difficult compromises, or division with all its predictable consequences.

47 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Trending News