Opinion
Rotary’s Four- Way Test As A Powerful Lens For Ethical Leadership
Published
4 months agoon
Four-Way Test ethical leadership is highlighted by Rotarian Ayoade Adeyemi as a guiding framework for truth, fairness and integrity in leadership decisions
Also read: Empowering Lagos Communities: 64 Artisans Benefit from Rotary Initiative
The Silence After a Lie
There is a kind of silence that follows a lie from a leader. It is not the silence of reflection. It is the silence of rupture.
Something invisible breaks in the room. Confidence retreats.
Respect hesitates.
Even those who say nothing begin, inwardly, to step back.
I have seen that silence in boardrooms where figures were adjusted just enough to look defensible.
I have felt it in community meetings where bold promises dissolved long before implementation began.
I have seen it on the global stage, where leaders chose the temporary convenience of a half-truth over the lasting discipline of integrity.
In each case, the damage was larger than the original lie.
It reached into morale, trust, culture, and the future.
“The Four-Way Test does not tell you what to think. It teaches you how to think when no one is watching. That is the difference between a policy and a conscience.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
Why Ethical Leadership Now Feels So Urgent
We are living through a period when leadership is under a hard light.
Institutions are questioned.
Governments are doubted.
Corporate motives are scrutinized. Communities are weary of polished speeches unaccompanied by moral consistency.
Across continents, people are no longer impressed by authority alone.
They want integrity.
They want sincerity.
They want leaders whose methods can survive public examination.
The consequences of poor leadership are no longer local.
A decision in one capital city can unsettle markets in another.
A hidden ethical failure can circle the globe before the people responsible have finished drafting their denial.
And yet, for all our talk about ethics, many leaders still struggle when it matters most.
It is one thing to speak about values in calm times.
It is another to protect those values when money, prestige, or timelines are at stake.
Over the years as a Rotarian, club president, and later an Assistant Governor I have returned repeatedly to one remarkably simple guide. It fits in your hand and governs a lifetime.
It asks only four questions, yet those questions can rescue decisions before they become regrets.
That guide is Rotary’s Four-Way Test.
The Test That Refuses to Grow Old
Originally formulated in 1932 by Herbert J. Taylor during a profound economic crisis, the Four-Way Test has outlived the era that produced it.
Many leadership ideas fade because they are tied to fashion.
This Test survives because it deals with something older and more permanent: the moral burden of human choice.
It asks:
Is it the TRUTH?
Is it FAIR to all concerned?
Will it build GOODWILL and BETTER FRIENDSHIPS?
Will it be BENEFICIAL to all concerned?
These are not ornamental questions.
They sound simple until placed beside ambition, pressure, fear, ego, or self-interest.
Then their real weight becomes clear.
The Questions Leaders Often Avoid
What gives the Four-Way Test its force is not how easy it is to memorize, but how difficult it is to apply honestly.
Many ethical frameworks fail because they remain abstract.
This one does not.
It follows you into meetings.
It enters contracts.
It interrupts rationalization.
I have sat in rooms where decent people became selective in their ethics once friendship or reputation was involved.
I have seen fairness quietly bent to favor familiarity. I have seen goodwill sacrificed in the name of efficiency.
I have seen benefit defined too narrowly, as though leadership were accountable only to those already at the table.
The Test does not flatter the leader. It confronts the leader.
“Ethical leadership is not about perfection; it is about disciplined reflection guided by principles that outlive power, position, and personal gain.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
The First Question: Is It the Truth?
Truth is the beginning of trust.
Once truth becomes negotiable, leadership enters dangerous territory.
Silence can mislead.
Omission can mislead.
Timing can mislead.
Many damaging failures begin with small accommodations made for convenience.
Truth includes honesty of intent, clarity of communication, and the courage to name reality without cosmetic alteration.
In governance, truth is accountability.
In business, it is reputation. In Rotary, it is how we report, promise, and serve.
“Truth is not merely what we say it is what we stand for when silence would be more convenient.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
A leader who abandons truth may command attention for a season, but will eventually lose moral authority.
And once moral authority is lost, formal authority becomes a fragile substitute.
The Second Question: Is It Fair to All Concerned?
Fairness tests leadership against justice not personal preference or hidden advantage.
This is where leaders become uncomfortable, because fairness widens the circle of consideration.
It asks who benefits, who bears the burden, who was consulted, and who was ignored.
Fairness may slow a decision.
It may disrupt convenience.
But fairness is what gives legitimacy to leadership.
Without it, even impressive outcomes carry the smell of imbalance.
“Leadership that is not fair may achieve results, but it will never achieve legitimacy.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
Internationally, fairness becomes layered with economic disparities, cultural expectations, and historical wounds.
Ethical leadership requires empathy, humility, and the willingness to hear different perspectives.
The Third Question: Will It Build Goodwill and Better Friendships?
This question is easy to underestimate. Some think it soft or secondary. It is not. It is strategic.
Leadership is relational.
Every decision strengthens trust or weakens it. Goodwill matters not because leaders must avoid hard choices, but because even hard choices should preserve dignity and human regard.
In a fractured world, the ability to build goodwill is not weakness. It is leadership maturity.
“The true measure of leadership is not the number of followers, but the strength of the relationships we build and sustain.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
Goodwill does not mean avoiding disagreement. It means disagreement without contempt. It means conviction without dehumanization.
The Fourth Question: Will It Be Beneficial to All Concerned?
This final question expands leadership beyond narrow self-interest.
It asks whether a decision creates shared value or merely concentrates advantage.
In our interconnected world, economic success divorced from social responsibility is unstable.
Political gain at the cost of civic trust is fragile.
What benefits only a few for only a while is not success it is deferred failure.
“Leadership finds its highest expression when success is measured not by individual gain, but by collective advancement.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
The Bankruptcy of “Effective” Leadership Without Ethics
Our age admires effectiveness.
Results matter.
But results without ethics are dangerous.
A leader may hit targets while quietly corroding the moral foundations beneath.
I have come to believe that effectiveness without ethics is not true leadership.
It is organized self-interest with a microphone.
“You can lead people to a golden city through a sewer, but do not be surprised when they refuse to drink the water once they arrive. The path is the product. The method is the message.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
I recall a young entrepreneur whose business was growing.
The numbers looked good.
But beneath the growth sat a hidden ethical compromise: uninsured drivers.
He wanted me to say this was just how business worked.
Instead, I asked him to walk through the Four-Way Test aloud.
Is it the truth? No.
Is it fair? No.
Will it build goodwill? No.
Will it be beneficial to all concerned? No.
His answers grew quieter.
What looked efficient became indefensible.
He changed course.
It cost him in the short term.
It saved him in the long term.
Ethics do not prevent sustainable success. They make it possible.
Rotarians as Custodians of Conscience
Rotarians are ordinary people with extraordinary ethical obligations.
We are not exempt from ambition or pressure.
But Rotary asks something serious: that service be anchored in moral discipline, not just good intention.
The Four-Way Test must never be reduced to ceremonial language. It is not there to decorate walls. It is there to examine motives.
“A framed Four-Way Test on a wall is not ethics. It is wallpaper. An applied Four-Way Test in a difficult conversation is surgery. One decorates. The other heals.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
I have seen clubs do remarkable work when they listen carefully and act transparently. I have also seen what happens when image overtakes integrity.
Rotary’s global strength lies not only in its reach, but in its capacity to model principled leadership in ordinary settings.
A club meeting.
A grant discussion.
A membership decision.
“Rotary does not just build leaders; it builds leaders who build humanity.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
A Word to World Leaders
The Four-Way Test belongs far beyond Rotary.
Its questions belong in presidential palaces, parliamentary chambers, and multinational boardrooms.
Look at the defining issues of our time climate justice, AI, migration, debt, peacebuilding.
Beneath the technical frameworks, these are ethical questions.
They concern truth, fairness, relationships, and shared benefit.
What would change if world leaders paused before every major decision and submitted it to these four questions? Not as public theatre, but as genuine inner work.
That leadership is not unrealistic. It is simply rarer than it should be.
The Inner Life of the Leader
At its deepest level, the Four-Way Test is about interior formation.
It asks what kind of person a leader is becoming while leading.
Leadership can enlarge a person or deform them. It can deepen humility or inflate ego.
Titles do not protect character.
Visibility does not guarantee virtue.
“The greatest leadership journey is not across nations or industries it is within the conscience of the leader.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
Applying the Test may cost you speed, popularity, or money.
It may create seasons of loneliness.
Still, it is worth it.
A leader can recover from being underestimated.
Recovering from moral collapse is far harder.
Conclusion: A Timeless Compass for a Changing World
The world is changing quickly, but the moral demands of leadership have not changed nearly as much as our technologies have.
Human beings still need truthful leaders.
Fair leaders.
Leaders who build trust and pursue shared benefit.
That is why Rotary’s Four-Way Test remains so powerful.
It is brief, but not small.
Simple, but not shallow.
Old, but not outdated.
For Rotarians, it is inheritance and responsibility.
For world leaders, it is an invitation.
For all of us, it is a mirror.
Lead with truth.
Act with fairness.
Build goodwill.
Pursue shared benefit.
That is not weak leadership.
That is durable leadership.
That is moral leadership.
That is leadership worthy of trust.
“When leaders choose ethics over expedience, they do not just change decisions they change destinies.”
Ayoade Adeyemi
Carry the Test.
Use it when the answer embarrasses you.
Use it when the pressure is high.
Use it until it becomes part of your reflex.
Service above self is the calling.
Also read: Rotary District 9112 Donates Raincoats and Boots to Support Lagos Polio Vaccination Teams
The Four-Way Test is one of the surest roads that leads us there.
You may like
-
GO BACK HOME?” NO. LET’S TALK FACTS: WHY DG HAMZAT’S ADVICE ON HOUSING IS PRACTICAL, NOT SURRENDER
-
Lawal Strengthens Zamfara Judiciary With ₦600m Support
-
2027: APC Unveils Campaign Council, Yari Named DG
-
FRSC Elevates 7,472 Officers, Marshals Nationwide
-
Dangote Transport Unveils Safer Real-Time Driver Monitoring
-
INEC Hails Osun Election as Strong Blueprint for 2027
Opinion
GO BACK HOME?” NO. LET’S TALK FACTS: WHY DG HAMZAT’S ADVICE ON HOUSING IS PRACTICAL, NOT SURRENDER*
Published
18 hours agoon
August 22, 2026
By Sola Fajobi | Lagos Citizen_
I don’t like shouting matches online. I have bills to pay in Lagos like everyone else.
But when I saw the backlash to Lagos State Deputy Governor, Dr. Obafemi Hamzat’s comment advising young workers to “live with parents, relatives, or share accommodation instead of rushing to rent expensive apartments,” I felt we were missing the point.
The headline was weaponized. The context was ignored. The data was buried.
Let’s talk facts.
*1. THE REALITY: LAGOS HAS A LAND PROBLEM, NOT JUST A POLICY PROBLEM*
Lagos is not like other states. We are running out of dry land.
*Lagos State Land & Housing Deficit – Quick Facts:*
– *Total land area*: ∼3,577 sq km. With reclamation it’s now ∼4,050 sq km
– *Lagos Metro land*: 999.6 sq km
– *Population 2025 estimate*: 17.8M in metro. 21M for greater metro area
– *Density*: 6,871/km2. Urban density hits 14,469/km2
That means 21 million people are fighting for space on land smaller than Oyo State. About 22% of Lagos is water. We can’t create more land without spending billions on reclamation like Eko Atlantic, Orange Island, and Banana Island — and those end up expensive by design.
Result: A housing deficit estimated at 2-3 million units. Demand will always outstrip supply until we address land + transportation.
So is telling people to “share accommodation” surrender? No. It’s what every mega city does.
*2. WHAT THE DG SAID IS ALREADY GLOBAL BEST PRACTICE*
London: A 1-bedroom in Zone 1 is £1,500 – £2,500/month. That’s ₦3M – ₦5M/month. So people live in Watford, Luton, Reading and commute 1hr+ by train.
New York: Young professionals have 3-4 “roommates” in a 2-bedroom in Manhattan/Brooklyn.
Toronto, Dubai, Singapore: Shared housing and living with family into your late 20s is normal.
The DG wasn’t saying “don’t be independent.” He was saying: “Be strategic while the system catches up.” That’s not failure. That’s financial intelligence.
Mistaking culture for policy is what critics did. But the truth is: sharing flats, living with family to save, and moving to affordable corridors is _both_ a personal strategy and a stop-gap that governments worldwide encourage.
*3. WHAT LAGOS GOVERNMENT IS ACTUALLY DOING ON HOUSING*
To say “there is no plan” is to ignore what’s on ground. The Sanwo-Olu/Hamzat administration has been the most aggressive on housing in 10 years:
*A. MASS HOUSING DELIVERY*
– *Lagos State Rent-to-Own & Rental Schemes*: Schemes in Igbogbo, Sangotedo, Iponri, Odo-Onosa/Ayandelu to reduce upfront burden.
– *Lagos Home Ownership Mortgage Scheme – LAGSHOM*: Subsidized mortgages for civil servants and private sector workers.
– *Public-Private Partnerships*: Over 20,000 housing units delivered or ongoing across the state.
*B. FIXING THE “YEARLY RENT” PROBLEM*
The Lagos Tenancy Law already caps agency/legals and encourages monthly, quarterly, half-yearly rent. Enforcement is the challenge, and LASRERA is currently clamping down on violators.
*C. THE REAL GAME CHANGER: TRANSPORT*
This is where the DG’s thinking makes sense. You don’t fix housing in Lagos by only building in Lagos Island. You fix it by making Badagry, Epe, Ikorodu, and border towns in Ogun viable.
– *Blue Line Rail*: Operational. Red Line: 80%+ complete.
– *Green & Yellow Lines*: In planning/procurement.
– *Goal*: Live in Badagry, work on Lagos Island, and get to work in <1 hour.
When that happens, land pressure reduces. Rents drop. This is exactly what London, Tokyo, and Paris did.
*4. THE MISSING PIECE: REGIONAL SOLUTION*
Lagos cannot do this alone. We need Ogun and Oyo to play.
Imagine: 100,000 housing units built along the Berger-Magboro-Abeokuta corridor with direct BRT/Rail links to Lagos. Ogun provides land. Lagos provides jobs. People win.
That’s the regional megacity model that works globally. The DG and Governor have been pushing this in the DAWN Commission and with the Ogun State Government.
*5. SO WHAT SHOULD LEADERSHIP SAY?*
Here’s what leadership _is_ saying, and what the DG meant:
“We know rent is high. We are building thousands of housing units. We are enforcing rent laws. We are building rail so you can live affordably outside the core.
While we do that, be smart: share accommodation, live with family to save, and don’t trap yourself in debt chasing a postcode.”
That is not “go back home.” That is “let’s build the ladder together.”
*CONCLUSION: CRITICIZE WITH SOLUTIONS, NOT SOUNDBITES*
I’m not in government. I’m a Lagosian paying rent too. I know the pain.
But we must separate frustration from facts. The housing crisis in Lagos is a math problem: too many people, too little dry land, too slow transport.
The answer isn’t vibes. It’s: more housing + cheaper rent options + working trains + regional planning.
That’s what this administration is working on. And that’s why I believe DG Hamzat, who has a background in urban planning and finance, is the right person to continue this work as the next Governor.
We don’t need recycled outrage. We need builders.
Let’s build the ladder.
_Sola Fajobi is a Lagos-based entrepreneur and writer. He writes about business, entertainment, media, policy and everyday life in Lagos.
Opinion
In Defence of Governor Dauda Lawal’s Administration Against Social Media Campaign of Calumny
Published
5 days agoon
August 18, 2026
By Oladapo Sofowora,
While many are wondering why naysayers of Governor Dauda Lawal are angered by his growing influence in Zamfara and Nigeria’s political space, which has led to his consistent inclusion in President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s foreign trips entourage, such critics are rather myopic or economical with the truth.
Also read: Ademola Adeleke: The power of dance as authentic branding proposition
Instead, they should be excited that a highly cerebral and financially prudent Governor like him is being included in these high-level diplomatic engagements, from which Zamfara stands to gain significantly.
These trips open the state to better strategic positioning and create room for foreign direct investment in agricultural development, mining and mineral resources and other critical sectors.
While counting its gains and celebrating that a state once known as Nigeria’s poverty capital is gradually reclaiming its lost glory, all thanks to Governor Dauda Lawal, many are playing politics with the collective future of Zamfara’s people.
The recent malicious and unverified post with the headline “ZAMFARA, Hijacked by Thieves!!” being shared across social media maligning and casting aspersions on Governor Dauda Lawal should not be overlooked by well-meaning Nigerians rather we all should collectively rebuke the author for trying to spread falsehood ignorantly by positing unverified stories to start a campaign of calumny against Governor Lawal and the Zamfara State Government.
The author is definitely on a mission to paint a picture that does not reflect the true situation on the ground.
Despite the opposition’s constant wailing, Zamfara has continued to shine, recording not only a change in fortune but also unprecedented infrastructural development across the state one not witnessed since the creation of the state decades ago.
Many states have even called for the Zamfara blueprint to be replicated elsewhere to achieve similar success. This shows that Governor Lawal is getting things right with his policies and also ways of actualising them.
Personally, despite witnessing all the developmental strides of Governor Lawal in Zamfara State, I find it essential to speak up against the lies being peddled online about a Governor who is financially prudent and has ensured that Zamfara experiences unprecedented development.
He could easily have opened the state’s purse and spent like a drunken sailor, but instead, he chose to invest in healthcare delivery, educational development, security, women’s empowerment, skills acquisition, infrastructural development, agriculture, transportation and more.
Governor Lawal is Attracting Investment and Not Junketing Around the World
The author alleged that Governor Lawal spent millions of dollars on globe-trotting despite the figures being overly inflated by the author to suit his agenda, but conveniently ignores the results of these diplomatic missions. The world does not invest in a state it cannot see. Governor Lawal has been a tireless advocate for Zamfara’s visibility on the global stage.
Unlike previous administrations, this government has actively engaged with development partners and investors, positioning Zamfara as an investment hub, a strategy that contributed to the recent launch of the $200 million Zamfara Lithium Mining and Processing Plant operated by ZAM Mining Co. Ltd in Boko Village, Zurmi LGA, a joint investment by Chinese firm Jinlide Co. Ltd, Bima Mines and other partners. In business, you use money to make money and for Zamfara, foreign direct investment has not only positioned the state as an investment destination but has also created jobs and revenue opportunities that will drive sustainable development.
The trips the author listed have further secured critical partnerships in agriculture, infrastructure and security. The so-called “first-class tickets” and “charters” are standard for high-level diplomatic engagements, designed to protect the safety and security of the state’s number one citizen.
This is not a luxury; it is a necessity and protocols allow for such travel arrangements. As Governor Dauda Lawal has always advocated for open books and financial prudence with his budget performance published annually, the financial allocations the author mentioned are for official purposes and are documented not pocketed.
The accusations are merely beer-parlour talk, given the massive influx of international support currently benefiting Zamfara State.
The United Nations Secretary-General, Mrs Amina Mohammed recently paid a visit to the state where he lauded the governor for his strides also the educational sector is receiving positive attention from a global educational development body.
These are gains of the foreign trips and every kobo spent is properly appropriated and accounted for in the budget performance.
On the allegations of lavish spending on aides, the author also listed inflated figures allegedly allocated to the Governor’s close aides, figures that are clearly obnoxious.
One wonders whether the author was present when the money he quoted was disbursed. The figures are merely a figment of his imagination, a blatant lie from the pit of hell.
All those mentioned have vehemently disclosed that they only receive allocations tied to their offices, as required by law and that nothing extra was paid.
The way the author quoted figures in dollars suggests he believes the dollar is official legal tender in Nigeria, which shows the author is simply trying to sell lies in a palatable way.
On ACReSAL and Development Contracts, the author has attempted to paint contracts for rural development as a “looting” exercise.
This is an insult to the hardworking people of Zamfara, who can see where their taxes are being put to good use and where allocations are being expended.
Some states award contracts that never see the light of day, but the contracts the author mentioned are verifiable and are actively being executed by the administration or some have been delivered.
In Zamfara, contracts are bid for with solid requirements and when any contractor meets the required standards and demonstrates capacity, such contracts are awarded. Nobody unbiased can see the work being done by Governor Lawal and call it inferior.
Contracts in Zamfara are executed with quality specifications and in line with stipulated procurement processes.
According to sources, many contractors are awarded jobs based on performance and track records. As regards the allegation that contracts are given to Governor Lawal himself, that is a complete falsehood. Governor Lawal is not a contractor. He was a seasoned investment banker before venturing into politics.
If the author can provide the name of Governor Lawal as director or owner of any company that has received contracts from Zamfara State, let him do so by publishing with facts and not mere assumption in a bid to distort the truth.
On the ACReSAL Project, the administration is actively implementing the Agro-Climatic Resilience in Semi-Arid Landscapes (ACReSAL) project.
Just recently, the project supported 1,000 Zamfara farmers with agricultural inputs and improved seeds to enhance food security.
The contracts listed are not handouts to “friends”; they are development projects awarded to qualified firms. For instance, the ACReSAL project has specific contracts for flood and erosion control, such as the reclamation of 1,000 hectares in Gusau and Bungudu LGAs. These are projects that save lives and land.
The Governor is committed to ensuring that the disbursement of funds actually delivers visible projects, unlike the previous administration where money was simply “shared” without any physical legacy.
The “Outsiders” Claim
The author also claims that over 90% of contracts are going to “outsiders” is a blatant lie. The government is transparently awarding contracts based on competence, speed and capacity.
The pace of development across Zamfara and its local governments is unprecedented. His Excellency is focused on leaving a legacy of infrastructure. The billions of naira being spent on roads, hospitals and the airport are not “looted”; they are being constructed.
The Airport recently had Zamfara pilgrims going for holy pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia fly and land after performing Hajj. We see the roads, the new Government House renovations, the solar power lighting up communities, the hospitals, the primary healthcare centres, the schools and more.
The author also mentioned a Zamfara indigene who got a contract based on their capacity. The question to be asked is were contracts not carried out and delivered? When an indigenous company gets a contract, the effect trickles down to the people because it’s a way of making funds move around the local economy.
Governor Lawal has always advocated that 80% of Labour for Zamfara contracts should be picked from the people within the community this will create job opportunities and will also ensure inclusion in terms of economic effect on the people who will benefit from getting paid.
On the security funds embezzlement allegation, I also find it deeply offensive that the writer would accuse the Governor and his aides of embezzling funds intended for security. Governor Dauda Lawal has made security his top priority, investing heavily in the security architecture of the state.
In the 2025 budget, security constitutes 6% of the total N545 billion “RESCUE BUDGET 2.0,” totalling N32.28 billion allocated to security interventions.
The Governor has established the Community Protection Guard (CPG), which has curtailed the level of insecurity experienced before the advent of his administration.
He has also been a vocal advocate for state police, arguing that it would give governors genuine authority as chief security officers to combat insecurity effectively.
The results are there for all to see: attacks have reduced, farmers are returning to their lands, and communities that were once deserted are now being repopulated. To insinuate that this administration is embezzling security funds is to insult the sacrifices of our gallant security forces who risk their lives daily to protect Zamfara citizens.
As much as I have wanted to look away from the lies being peddled, posterity would judge me for keeping quiet when such falsehoods are being consumed hook, line and sinker by many who believe them.
The allegations are nothing but cheap political tricks. The administration under Governor Dauda Lawal has empowered more Zamfara indigenes in the last two years than in the previous ten.
However, the administration should not allow a “taxi” company without the machinery to execute a multi-billion-naira road project just to satisfy the quota of “indigeneship.” The government is building a state not an employment bureau for political cronies.
I urge the public to disregard this baseless blackmail. The Governor remains undeterred in its mission to reset the Zamfara narrative. The administration of Governor Lawal is open to scrutiny, but should not entertain a critique that ignores the visible evidence of development.
Also read: Vanguard @ 40: Journalism is madness best unleashed in youth
The administration’s books are open, projects are visible and the Governor is firmly on the ground politically. Instead of spreading falsehoods, the author should visit these project sites and see for himself the transformation of a state finally freed from the shackles of poor leadership.
By Bola BOLAWOLE,
Dr. Segun Osoba, Marxist scholar and historian, was one of my mentors and role models. Our paths crossed long before I came face-to-face with the enigma at the then University of Ife, now Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, where he not only taught me courses in the History department, but was also our staff adviser and comrade.
Also read: When Port Harcourt hosted Wole Soyinka
Cerebral and unflinchingly principled, Osoba snubbed the usual hussle, if I may call it that, of many academics to attain to the professoral status, preferring to remain “Dr.” even though everyone knew he was not the mate of many a professor!
For me, Osoba’s fame travelled far ahead of him. Appointed by the Murtala Muhammed regime into the Constitution Drafting Committee in October 1975, Osoba, together with his ideological soulmate, Dr. Bala Usman of the History department of the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, broke ranks with the other members of the CDC to author a people-oriented draft Constitution that made the Nigerian people’s interests, aspirations and well-being its focal point. It was termed the Minority Report.
Expectedly, the conservative Olusegun Obasanjo regime that succeeded Murtala Muhammed rejected the Osoba/Bala Usman report while accepting the report of the majority members of the CDC on September 14, 1976. The CDC was chaired by Chief FRA Williams.
The majority/minority report divide apart, the CDC was not without its controversies: The sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, had declined to serve on the committee, thereby reducing its members from 50 to 49. There was also the debate as to what would have been the choice of a much more radical Murtala Muhammed had he not been assassinated on February 13, 1976.
Specifically because of Osoba and Bala Usman, I chose to study History in the university! And I was fortunate to drink from the fountain of knowledge at the feet of Dr. Osoba on and off the classroom. As comrades, our relationship did not end at Ife; usually, comradeship is a life-long endeavour.
In late December 2023, after a spell of ‘long-time-no-see’, four of us old students/comrades of Comrade Osoba decided to visit him at his Ijebu-Ode residence – Femi Falana, SAN; Ambassador Ayo Olukanni; Kayode Komolafe (K.K.) and my humble self.
Comrade was still his very sharp and humorous self. Despite his health challenges, he still “recognised” each and everyone of us by our voice. We discussed for hours and it was amazing that ill-health spared his intellect. He was his familiar self – analytical, even if caustic, going down memory lane and recalling facts and figures as if he was reading them from a book spread out before him.
We promised to return. Unfortunately, we procrastinated, despite Olukanni’s repeated prodding. But as individuals, we attended his 90th birthday celebration held at Ijebu-Ode on 9th January, 2025. His book, “Critical and Contentious Issues in the Modern and Contemporary History of Nigeria: Collected Writings of Samuel Olusegun Osoba”, which was unveiled at the occasion, adorns my Library. See also my “Tributes to Comrade (Dr.) Segun Osoba at 90”, published in this column in the Wednesday, 15 January, 2025 edition of the New Telegraph newspaper.
Dr. Osoba passed away peacefully at home in Ijebu-Ode on 14 May, 2026. A flurry of activities by comrades from all the nooks and crannies of this country as well as abroad celebrated his life, extolled his virtues, pledged to continue the struggle from where he stopped, and bid him farewell from this earthly plane. In this were the words of Che Guevara fulfilled: “Wherever death may surprise us, let it be welcome, provided that this, our battle cry, may have reached some receptive ear and another hand may be extended to wield our weapons (Message to the Tricontinental, 1967).”
I was unable to participate fully in some of the activities because of the tragedy that fell at my doorsteps at about the same time.
First, my elder sister’s husband, Gabriel Alani Olusola Omiyale, died on June 11, 2026 at the age of 89 years. He was a mentor. Then came the bombshell: His daughter – and my sister’s second child, Abosede Oluwayemisi – died the same month on June 29th at the age of 54!
That was massive! To say we were devastated is an understatement. If the pains that attended Bose’s death remain indescribable, the ways and manners of her husband and his family immediately before and after her death remain a puzzle. They rubbed insults on our injury.
They desecrated our Yoruba customs and traditions. Bose had heroically battled the scourge of breast cancer; after undergoing an operation, we were all optimistic she was on the path to full recovery until tests showed she needed more medical attention.
Naturally, she was devastated but, gradually, she built up the confidence and strength required to see her through. No stone was left unturned by her extended family who did not leave the load for the husband and his family to carry. All hands were on deck.
The extended family had always been there for Bose. Her siblings had been wonderful; never allowing her husband’s unstable job situation to show or affect Bose’s treatment and other needs, including her children’s education and welfare. I also played my part. I am grateful to everyone who responded to our clarion call in many ways.
We were hopeful we would all pull through it and that Bose’s case would be another testimony that cancer can be beaten. All she needed – as much as medicare – were words of encouragement and support. That, however, became the weakest link!
Act one: Against the best advice of her mother, my niece was made to consume a concoction that turned the tide. According to her husband, the concoction was procured by his own brother in Akure, Ondo state, taken to a church for prayers after which it was dispatched through a motorpark! Bose drank this concoction and started vomiting. In his own testimonies, Bose’s husband took her to a hospital where she was given drips, which gave her some strength, but because the doctor was late in coming, he took her back home despite the fact that the test they ran indicated that she had a blood infection! That night at home, she started vomiting again and, according to the husband’s testimony, he took her again to the hospital by 1.30am. She was left unattended until late afternoon when she fell into a coma! Bose’s blood infection was never treated until she passed away!
Act Two: Our standard practice had been to always double-check whatever a doctor said or prescribed, but on this fatal day, Bose’s husband kept all of us in the dark. We were not told of the blood infection. We were not alerted when she started vomiting again in the night. We were not informed when he took her again to the hospital. According to him, Bose walked with her own legs into the hospital, climbing the row of stairs all by herself.
Act Three: At the hospital, the husband took Bose’s phone and locked it in the car parked downstairs. So she had no access to her phone – to call out or receive in-coming calls. She was held incommunicado. And there was no one else there with the husband and wife. He called noone; he also snubbed repeated incoming calls into his own phone, including from my elder sister, who is Bose’s mother.
Act four: Later that afternoon, the husband called me to say Bose was not responding to treatment and that I should start interceding for her. I was aghast! I had been waiting all day for them to link up with me for a scheduled appointment. Later, a female voice using the husband’s phone called me to quickly come to the hospital. I was on my way there when Bose’s second child, a girl writing exams at the Obafemi Awolowo University, called me, sobbing! “Daddy, what is happening to my Mom? My Daddy called me and said my Mummy is in coma” Coma! “Yes, sir”, the girl replied, “and my Daddy said my Mummy is dead!” I almost lost control of the wheel because I was driving.
Act Five: On getting to the hospital, they had already started embalming Bose! I screamed at the husband, but the hospital staff restrained me. Why the haste? Without any of her family members present! A thousand thoughts ran riot in my head. At 6.28 pm, Bose’s mortal remains were deposited in the morgue and we left.
Act Six: While we were agonizing about how to break the sad news to Bose’s mother, her husband and his family had posted Bose’s death on every conceivable social media platform, breaking the news to her young children, the oldest of whom is just a little over 20 years while the youngest is 14!
Act seven: We the siblings of Bose’s mother wanted a decent burial for her. We wanted her dreams and visions for her children respected. Bose’s husband and his family spurned all of that! They weaponized Bose’s young children against us. They threw their so-called customs and traditions in our face at every turn – as if the Yoruba have no customs and traditions. They employed deceit and subterfuge and hurriedly committed Bose to mother earth without any of her family members present! We warned! They ignored and played games!
Google says Edema is a name answered by both the Urhobo and Itsekiri people of Delta state. Does their culture permit the trumping of Yoruba customs and traditions? Should a husband boast to his children – while their mother was still battling cancer – that, if she dies, he will remarry? So, expect his wedding invitation!
Also read: When Port Harcourt hosted Wole Soyinka
Had Bose died of cancer, our pains would have been less insufferable; but she did not! Were they tired of the stress and wanted closure so they could move on with their own life? Hastened to her death! Hurried to the grave! This is to put the records straight. Our immediate attention, however, is the good health of Bose’s mother – and Daddy Omiyale’s burial slated for 29th and 30th of October this year.
Let Dr. Segun Osoba rest in power! And eternal rest grant Abosede Oluwayemisi Edema (nee Omiyale), O Lord!
(Published in the TREASURES column on the back page of the Wednesday, 5 August, 2026 edition of the New Telegraph newspaper).
Recent Post
- GO BACK HOME?” NO. LET’S TALK FACTS: WHY DG HAMZAT’S ADVICE ON HOUSING IS PRACTICAL, NOT SURRENDER
- GO BACK HOME?” NO. LET’S TALK FACTS: WHY DG HAMZAT’S ADVICE ON HOUSING IS PRACTICAL, NOT SURRENDER*
- Governor Dauda Lawal Commends Senator Yari’s Appointment as President Tinubu’s Campaign Council DG
- Lawal Strengthens Zamfara Judiciary With ₦600m Support
- 2027: APC Unveils Campaign Council, Yari Named DG
Trending News
-
Politics2 years ago
13 Ondo Assembly Members Disown Endorsement of Aiyedatiwa
-
Politics2 years ago
APC Group, Ondo Govt, Quarrel Over Money for Endorsement
-
Trending News5 years agoStop unsavoury, inciting statements – DSS warns
-
Others5 years agoAdron Homes Celebrates 10 Years Of Housing Excellence
-
Humanity5 years agoPresident Buhari Commiserates With Ambassador Maureen Tamuno Over The Loss Of Her Father
-
Others7 years agoEX- CUSTOMS BOSS, IBRAHIM MERA’S DWINDLING FAME
-
Business2 years agoBigi Carbonated Soft Drinks Treats 40 Consumers to an Epic Easter Movie Hangout
-
Business2 years agoWema Bank Shines at Global SME Finance Forum Conference Awards 2024 …Awarded: • SME Financier of the Year (Africa) • Platinum Award for Best Financier for Women Entrepreneurs (Africa)

