Connect with us

Opinion

Interrogating Tinubu’s recurring absence at the UN General Assembly…

Published

on

Tinubu

By Bola BOLAWOLE,

adron lemon friday

 

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to skip the ongoing 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly, the third such abstention in a row, has raised eyebrows and sparked speculations.

Also read: Governor Dauda Lawal Approves 95% Salary Increase for Health Workers

Expectedly, opposition politicians have wasted no time in feasting on the official announcement that the vice-president, Kashim Shettima, will, once again, stand in for the president.

This trumps an earlier announcement by Jimoh Ibrahim, the country’s Ambassador to the United States/Permanent Representative to the United Nations, that not only would the president attend the annual meeting of world leaders at the UN headquarters in New York, USA, but that a vantage position had been secured for him to sit very close to the maverick United States’ president, Donald Trump!

Since he assumed the country’s leadership in 2023, Tinubu has yet to attend a single UNGA meeting; so also has he yet to pay either official or private visit to the United States despite that he has reportedly embarked, so far, on 52 foreign trips. He has visited at least 30 different countries across Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas, spending approximately 261 days.

As we speak, the president is out of the country on holidays, first to the UK after which he is expected in France. So, is there anything that aileth Tinubu about the United States? That is where the speculation begins; however, it does not end there!

Is President Tinubu deliberately avoiding the United States? Has it got anything to do with the unending controversy and legal battles over the FBI files and Tinubu’s past activities in the United States? He schooled there; he also worked there before returning to Nigeria decades back.

During the giddy days of the Sani Abacha military dictatorship, the US provided succour and a safe haven for Tinubu and many other pro-democracy activists. What has since changed is the question to ask if the suspicion is that the president is deliberately avoiding the United States.

Or has it got anything to do with the unpredictability of President Trump and the activities of anti-Tinubu politicians here at home and the paid groups doing their bidding in the US? Who dare put anything beyond a president that organized the storming, arrest, and rendition of a sitting foreign leader, hauling him and his wife to the US for trial on drug-related charges, with the country of the leader concerned and the international community as a whole helpless to do anything about it! “What if” then becomes the question should Tinubu set foot on US soil! Is it not better, then, to err on the side of caution?

Another school of thought is that Tinubu’s health might need attention. Unlike in much of the Western world, the secrecy that surrounds the health conditions of Nigerian, nay, African leaders makes it difficult to speak authoritatively on their health conditions.

And this is not new. Babangida, Abacha, Abdulsalami, Yar’Adua all had rumours swirling around their health conditions while in office. Abacha and Yar’Adua died in office. Buhari spent close to one-third of his tenure shuttling between the country and his doctors in the UK. It has been said, this time around, that Tinubu’s doctors are in France.

With part of his holiday reportedly scheduled to be spent in Charles de Gaulle’s country, could this holiday be another disguised medical tourism? Health is wealth, as they say, and prioritizing one’s health and wellbeing over and above a meeting, no matter how important, can be justified, especially when we have been told that the president can be (adequately?) represented at the UNGA.

Then I asked Google: Is it compulsory that the president lead his country’s delegation to the UNGA? The answer is: No, it is not compulsory for a president or prime minister to lead their country’s delegation to the UNGA.

Alternatively, the president or prime minister can be represented by the vice president or deputy prime minister, the foreign affairs minister or the country’s permanent representative at the UN who can speak, vote and act on behalf of the country or member-state concerned.

History records that many world leaders have frequently failed to personally attend UNGA due to divergent reasons, such as pressing domestic issues, disasters or local crises needing their personal attention or for health reasons.

Super-power rivalry and politics, and the need to remain non-committal or stay neutral from taking sides on volatile issues have also been known to compel foreign leaders to skip personally attending UNGA.

When a country’s leader attends the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in person, it provides several distinct strategic, diplomatic, and political advantages that cannot be replicated through virtual participation or lower-level delegation.

Some of these advantages are: High-level bilateral diplomacy (the “Margin” meetings); spontaneous networking whereby leaders hold informal, face-to-face meetings on the sidelines (the “margins”) of the assembly, allowing them to resolve disputes or advance treaties quickly.

It also affords the opportunity of building rapport. Personal presence helps build trust and personal relationships between heads of state, which can be critical during international crises.

Other advantages include enhanced global visibility and influence as UNGA gives leaders a global or world stage to operate from.

A speech delivered in person by a head of state commands significantly more international media attention and diplomatic weight than a pre-recorded video or speech read by a representative.

Some world leaders have been noted for setting agendas on issues of national, regional or international importance at UNGA. Leaders can directly pitch their nation’s foreign policy priorities, economic opportunities, or security concerns to a global audience.

Personal attendance at UNGA also helps to facilitate efficient multilateral engagement or what is called “mini-Summits” among leaders.

Leaders can participate in localized, high-level side events or regional summits (such as G7, BRICS, or regional blocs like the EU and the African Union) that have been known to convene in New York during the UNGA week. When leaders attend UNGA in person, direct access to decision-makers is made possible.

Smaller or developing nations also can seize the opportunity to have direct, unmediated access to leaders of superpower nations as well as heads of major international organizations like the UN itself, the World Bank and IMF. We can go on and on!

At the level of individual nations, attending UNGA is said to project an image of strength, global respect, and statesmanship to citizens back at home.

Newly-elected leaders especially use UNGA to announce themselves to the international community to garner support and recognition, to state their goals and set agendas as well as make profound statements on their administration’s foreign policy direction.

UNGA also serves as a formal introduction to the international community and signals the leader’s commitment to global cooperation.

From the above, it is, without doubt, a disadvantage when leaders absent themselves from UNGA. No matter how “powerful” a substitute representation is, it cannot be the same as when the president or prime minister of a country leads it.

There is what is called “bragging rights” among leaders. Presidents prefer to deal with presidents; vice presidents or foreign ministers will be shuffled down the ladder to discuss with their equivalents or counterparts.

The reverse is the case, however, where presidents of less powerful countries queue or consider it a privilege to have an audience with the foreign affairs minister or envoy of powerful countries such as the US, China, Russia, etc.

One narrative for Tinubu’s recurring absence at UNGA being spinned by his detractors is the fear of the unknown over the FBI files and Tinubu’s alleged past encounter with the US judicial system.

But a man, once tried and acquitted of criminal charges, cannot be tried again on the same offence except fresh evidence pops up that possesses the likelihood of affecting the outcome of the trial in the opposite direction.

Furthermore, can any harm come the way of a visiting president attending UNGA? Or, put more directly and blatantly, can a foreign leader attending UNGA in New York, USA be arrested for any reason whatsoever by the US authorities? The answer is, no; leaders attending UNGA cannot be arrested, charged or tried in the US because they enjoy immunity.

Under the UN Headquarters Agreement, the United States has an international obligation to allow accredited representatives entry and transit to the UN as well as respect their diplomatic inviolability.

In like manner, no US state, city, local government or county official possesses the legal power to arrest a protected visiting foreign leader.

From the above, it is most unlikely that President Tinubu stands the risk of being arrested in the US if he chooses to personally attend UNGA.

What may happen is that demonstrators may mass at the UN headquarters venue of UNGA, organize protests and heckle him and his delegation.

That will be embarrassing enough. For sure, it will portray the country in bad light and dent its image – which all Nigerians, including the president’s adversaries, will suffer from.

Also read: Governor Dauda Lawal Approves 95% Salary Increase for Health Workers

To avoid such an embarrassment and the deleterious effects it may have on the country’s image appears as the most germane reason why Tinubu has kept away – and may continue to keep sway – from UNGA until, maybe, a more predictable president mounts the saddle in the United States. And the losers? – Nigeria and Nigerians!

(Published in the TREASURES column on the back page of the NEW TELEGRAPH newspaper edition of Wednesday, 23 September, 2026).

64 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Agege APC Stakeholders Write to State Party Leaders to take action on defected members, their supporters

Published

on

APC

By Daniel Oluwatobiloba Popoola,

adron lemon friday

 

Concerned leaders and members of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Agege Federal Constituency have petitioned the Lagos State Chairman of the party over the defection of two former House of Assembly aspirants to the Allied Peoples Movement (APM).

Also read: FG Threatens Lagos Coastal Highway Shutdown Over Safety Breaches

The petition dated Sunday, 20 September, 2026, was addressed to the state chairman at the APC secretariat in Lagos by stakeholders operating from 103 Orile Road, Orile Agege.

In the letter, the concerned leaders reported that Hon. Ganiyu Kola Egunjobi and Mr. Azeez Yusuf, who contested the last primaries for Agege State Constituencies 01 and 02, have defected to the APM and emerged as candidates of the party.

The group said the development has implications for stability, unity and electoral planning ahead of the 2027 general elections if urgent action is not taken.

According to the petition, the movement may extend beyond the two defectors to include elements of APC structures linked to them, including executives and stakeholders at local government and ward levels.

The stakeholders recalled three previous correspondences on the matter, including a letter dated February 19, 2026, by concerned APC Agege stakeholders, another dated May 18, 2026, on alleged marginalisation of Justice Forum members and disregard for party-approved appointments in Agege and Orile-Agege, and a petition on alleged disregard of party directives in the screening and swearing-in of nominated supervisors.

Furthermore, the letter expressed worry over reports that some serving councillors, supervisors, Secretaries to Local Government, Local Government Chairmen and other political appointees at state level are involved in activities associated with the APM structure.

The petitioners warned that the situation could create divided loyalty and confusion, with APC structures controlled by persons now contesting under another platform, thereby weakening coordination and mobilisation.

The group also alleged possible diversion and misuse of party and local government resources to support candidates of another party, noting that structures at ward and LGA levels were being deployed except for resistance from loyal members.

The stakeholders cited the recent controversy over appointment and screening of supervisors in Agege and Orile-Agege as evidence of the need to uphold party directives and constituted authority.

The letter further recalled a petition dated July 31, 2026, by Concerned Agege Leaders, alleging that some members duly appointed by the governor and party leaders as supervisors were denied their positions while others were sworn in by the chairmen of Agege LG and Orile-Agege LCDA.

The forum argued that retaining unresolved party structures whose principal actors have shifted loyalty to the APM could hamper grassroots mobilisation, communication and election coordination.

The petition added that the development could discourage loyal members and weaken discipline, thereby encouraging further fragmentation beyond Agege Federal Constituency.

Consequently, the concerned leaders urged the state leadership and appropriate organs of the party to conduct an urgent, impartial and comprehensive review of affected structures across Agege with a view to taking disciplinary action.

The group also called for corrective measures in the interest of the party, its State Assembly candidates, loyal members and supporters.

The stakeholders appealed to the leadership to treat the matter with urgency, stressing that the objective is not to create division or target individuals, but to protect unity, discipline, integrity and electoral organisation.

Also read: FG Threatens Lagos Coastal Highway Shutdown Over Safety Breaches

The petition noted that early action and reconstitution of unresolved structures would prevent internal confusion, restore confidence among loyal members and ensure the APC approaches the 2027 elections with committed and accountable grassroots structures.

73 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Opinion

Cross-Border Digital Services Emerge as New Driver of Nigeria’s Economy — Experts

Published

on

By

Nigeria’s growing digital workforce is opening a new channel for cross-border trade as software developers, consultants, financial professionals, educators and other service providers increasingly work from the country for clients across Africa, Europe and North America.

adron lemon friday

The development is expanding the country’s non-oil economic activity beyond the traditional export of physical goods, with high-speed telecommunications enabling professionals to deliver services internationally without moving people or physical products across borders.

Industry experts said the trend is also increasing the economic importance of sustained investment in telecommunications infrastructure, as unreliable connectivity can directly affect the ability of digital businesses and remote professionals to meet international contracts and delivery schedules.

They spoke during an economic dialogue co-hosted by financial planner Kalu Aja and chartered accountant Oluwatosin Olaseinde, founder of digital investment platform Ladda, on Sunday, September 20, 2026.

Olaseinde said telecommunications investment was creating productive capacity for the wider economy by enabling Nigerians to participate in increasingly decentralised forms of work.

“On a retail level, it’s not just them investing in capital expenditure—it’s actually creating economic capacity, productive capacity for the Nigerian economy,” she said.

She pointed to the growing number of Nigerians working remotely for clients and organisations outside their immediate locations.

“Remote workers can actually work. People are sitting in Lagos with clients in Nairobi, New York, London. Online tutoring—somebody sitting in Lagos tutoring children in Kaduna, in Nairobi, just all over,” Olaseinde said.

According to her, greater access to connectivity also exposes Nigerian professionals to international markets and standards, potentially improving the quality of services delivered from the country.

“It also raises the level of competence and service delivery in Nigeria… The excellence level goes up,” she insisted.

The expansion of cross-border digital services, however, places greater emphasis on network reliability. For professionals whose work depends on international clients, interruptions to connectivity can affect online meetings, project delivery, cloud applications, payments and other business processes.

Aja said the scale of investment required to maintain that connectivity was often underestimated because much of the infrastructure supporting the digital economy remained largely invisible to consumers.

Citing MTN Nigeria’s financial disclosures, he pointed to cumulative capital expenditure of about ₦1.62 trillion, covering network infrastructure and related investments.

“In every local government area in Nigeria there is an MTN somewhere,” Aja said, adding “You’ll either find a tower or you’re going to find someone selling recharge cards. That’s the depth and level of their contribution to Nigeria so far… If that all goes away, it’s a massive hole nobody can fill.”

The discussion highlighted the wider relationship between telecommunications investment and economic activity as businesses increasingly depend on digital platforms to reach customers, process transactions and deliver services.

Nigeria’s telecommunications sector accounted for 9.19 percent of GDP in the first quarter of 2026, according to the official figure cited during the discussion, underscoring the sector’s growing contribution to economic output.

Beyond domestic commerce, the growth of remote work and digitally delivered services provides Nigerian professionals with access to markets where contracts and payments are denominated in foreign currencies. It also allows firms to expand their client base without establishing physical operations in every market they serve.

Olaseinde also drew a distinction between foreign direct investment and foreign portfolio investment, arguing that long-term capital commitments can have a broader effect on employment and productive capacity.

“FPI is like a one-night stand. FDI is like a marriage,” she said, arguing that direct investment tends to involve longer-term commitments and can create jobs and productive capacity.

The experts also discussed the contribution of large corporates through taxes, dividends and continued investment. MTN Nigeria, for instance, paid ₦419.9 billion in dividends and ₦429 billion in taxes in 2025, according to the figures cited during the discussion.

For the expanding digital-services economy, the implications extend beyond the telecommunications industry. Developers, consultants, online educators, financial professionals, creators and other service providers increasingly depend on connectivity to participate in markets beyond Nigeria.

The development suggests that as Nigeria seeks to diversify its economy and expand non-oil sources of income, the ability to deliver services digitally could become an increasingly important component of its international economic activity.

For businesses operating in that space, reliable connectivity is therefore becoming less a convenience than a basic requirement for maintaining access to customers and markets across borders.

46 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Opinion

Are owls evil birds?

Published

on

owls

By Bolanle Bolawole,

adron lemon friday

 

Sometime this year, I was alerted to the presence of an owl perching on the PHCN line overlooking my apartment. And so what, I asked! The response I got shocked me: Don’t you know that owls are evil birds? I quickly jumped out of bed! I really never knew anything about owls. I went to my window and saw it. I began to “bind and cast.” I followed this up by picking up a stone and going after it. It flew away before I could reach it. Days later, the owl appeared again. I went after it again with prayer and action. Again, it flew away before I could reach it. Every night afterwards I checked the PHCN line before going to bed and whenever I woke up in the night. There was no sight of it. Still, I prayed.

Also read: Coalition Defends NSCDC Commandant-General, Rejects Calls for His Removal Over Minna Detainee Deaths

Not long afterwards, a classmate and friend who had suffered a stroke earlier, died. He was 69. Closely afterwards, my in-law, a mentor, died at the age of 89.

Then real tragedy struck in the same month with the death of his daughter and my niece, at 54. In July alone a chorister in my church lost her father who was 65.

My panel beater lost a 14-year-old child; a pastor friend died at a relatively young age, and then another schoolmate and professional colleague also passed on at the age of 67. More deaths of colleagues and known faces have since followed.

Are owls evil birds? Are they the harbingers or messengers of death? This is what Google has to say about this mysterious bird: “No, owls are not evil birds; they are simply wild, nocturnal animals fulfilling a natural role in the environment.”

But owls, all the same, have a really bad reputation. Their nocturnal lifestyle is one. They hunt and move around in the dark and people historically associate darkness with fear and the unknown. Owls also fly silently: Their specialized feathers let them fly completely silently, causing them to appear suddenly out of nowhere.

They also have human-like facial features, with their forward-facing eyes giving them an intense, penetrating gaze that can feel uncanny or unsettling. Owl’s eerie sounds, strange screeches, clicks, and hoots in the dead of night have also fueled ghost stories for centuries.

There are also a lot of cultural myths and superstitions pertaining to owls. Many cultures around the world historically view owls as bad omens or messengers of death.

“In general, owls are viewed as harbingers of bad luck, ill health, or death. The belief is widespread even today.” According to Wikipedia, this belief cuts across the globe. Among the Kikuyu of Kenya, it was believed that owls were harbingers of death. If one saw an owl or heard its hoot, someone was going to die.

In the Americas, the culture of the Uto-Aztec tribe, the Hopi, has “taboos surrounding owls, which are associated with sorcery and other evils. The Aztecs and Maya, along with other natives of Mesoamerica, considered the owl a symbol of death and destruction. In fact, the Aztec god of death, Mictlantecuhtli, was often depicted with owls. There is an old saying in Mexico that is still in use: ‘When the owl cries/sings, the Indian dies’.

“The Popol Vuh, a Mayan religious text, describes owls as messengers of Xibalba (the Mayan “Place of Fright”). The belief that owls are messengers and harbingers of the dark powers is also found among the Hočągara (Winnebago) of Wisconsin. When in earlier days the Hočągara committed the sin of killing enemies while they were within the sanctuary of the chief’s lodge, an owl appeared and spoke to them in the voice of a human, saying, ‘From now on the Hočągara will have no luck.’ This marked the beginning of the decline of the tribe. An owl appeared to Glory of the Morning, the only female chief of the Hočąk nation, and uttered her name. Soon afterwards she died.

“People often allude to the reputation of owls as bearers of supernatural danger when they tell misbehaving children, ‘the owls will get you.’ Also, in the Cherokee culture, as well as many other Native American cultures, owls are a very bad omen. It is said that if you are outside in broad daylight and an owl flies over your head, a family member or loved one would die within the coming week. In the Middle East, Arab mythology sees owls as bad omens.”

Some other cultures, however, see owls in a different light i.e. as a wise creature (for example, Hinduism in India.) In Japan, souvenir shops display little owl figurines that are supposed to bring good luck.

The Japanese word for owl is ‘fukurou’, and the first part of the word (‘fuku’) can be written with the same character as ‘luck’ or the whole word can literally be written as ‘no suffering/troubles’.”

So, what is it really about owls? It would appear owls signify different strokes for different people – and for different reasons as well. Superstition exists everywhere. And every superstitious belief has a logic behind it.

Most of the time, this is weaved around the fear of the unknown and the recoil from what Cicero, a Roman philosopher, called the ultimate evil.

Cicero, also noted for his oratorical gift, defined the Latin term “summum malum” as “the highest evil” and “summum bonum” as “the highest good” in his foundational ethical treatise titled “On the Ends of Good and Evil”.

He reportedly used these concepts to compare how different ancient Greek schools such as the Stoics, Epicureans, and Peripatetics defined the ultimate goal of human life (summum bonum) vis-a-vis what they sought most to avoid (summum malum). Cicero, however, merely built on the thoughts of earlier ancient Greek philosophers like Plato and Aristotle.

Thomas Hobbes, another Western philosopher and famous author of the “Leviathan” (1651) rejected the idea of a universal “summum bonum” due to conflicting human desires, but agreed that a definitive “summum malum” did exist: the fear of violent death.

What is certain, and which is known to all civilizations, is that the traffic between heaven and earth is never ending; and that this is as sure as day follows night.

As Orlando Owoh crooned, just as babies are born on a daily basis, so also do people die – owl or not owl. Were the universe to be rid of owls, people would still die! All the same because I am not Japanese, owls are not the kind of birds I love to see!

Robbing Peter to pay Paul: A lose-lose situation

Can these figures be correct? Since I came across them on the internet, I have not seen a rebuttal from any quarters. So, since silence is said to mean consent, I want to assume that the figures are factual – until the contrary is proven.

The disturbing information goes thus: “Six geo-political zones’ contribution to the VAT pool and (what each of them) received (in return) in half-year January -June 2026): 1. South-west contributed N2.16trn but received N691.56bn (31.99%). 2. South-south contributed N880.58bn but received N429.99bn (48.83%). 3. North-central contributed N302.81bn but received N350.17bn (115.64%).

4. North-west contributed N205.52bn but received N384.56bn (187.11%). 5. North-east contributed N152.82bn but received N285.70bn (186.95%). 6. The South-east contributed N79.27bn but received N230.89bn (291.28%).”

Are you not surprised that the South-east zone contributed the least but received the highest, percentage-wise? This means that a region always screaming “marginalization” is the one actually marginalizing others!

All the three zones in the North received more than they contributed; meaning that, like the South-east, they benefit from the sweat of others – in other words, they reap on a monthly basis from where they did not sow! The two burden-bearer zones are the South-south and South-west, with the latter being the greater losers.

Those riding on the back of others will never disembark unless they are forced to.

Unfortunately, free lunch offers no incentives for anyone to work harder.

And those being held down as beasts of burden will never achieve their true potential for as long as they carry the can for others. What a lose-lose situation in real or absolute terms!

FEEDBACK

RE: If state police are not to suffer a stillbirth…

Thank you so much for this piece! Brig-Gen. Jibola Togun once drew my attention to the lack of support by our governors for Amotekun after the exit of Rotimi Akeredolu from earthly life.

I have written no fewer than five times on the imperatives of the establishment of state police, drawing attention to how formal policing began at Abeokuta in 1903, but took off in 1905, followed by Ibadan in 1906 and Oyo, 1907 and from there to other divisions of Yorubaland.

If our forebears could see the imperatives of divisional and regional policing, the attitude of our governors after Akeredolu has been shocking and disappointing. The first responsibility of any government is security.

It is, in fact, the origin of government. We can see now that the establishment of state police has received a national stamp. Well done! – Lade Bonuola

Has Tinubu lost his grip on the Nigerian media?

The shortcomings you highlighted and the solutions proffered are top-notch. I am one of those who believe until tomorrow that (Dele) Alake should have been Tinubu’s spokesman (but) rumours have it that Gbaja and Alake can not co-habit at the villa! Reno Omokri is doing far better than all the government paid spokesmen, including Onanuga. Ask yourself why Dele Momodu and Femi Ojudu distanced themselves from Tinubu. Self-interest, I presume! I have read the “Adventure of Guerrilla Journalist” by Ojudu and I have heard Momodu narrate how Tinubu gave him 500 pounds while they were in exile. I have equally heard how Remi asked: “Uncle Dee, so you are not going to work for my husband?” That question is loaded. Nobody runs Tinubu down as does the duo! I don’t think the Nigerian Press is as dangerous as the TV anchor personalities. Many no longer read newspapers but depend on TV stations. Arise News, for instance, sees all government actions from negative perspectives. They know who to invite: hardly will you see their guests not towing their preferred line of thought.

More often than not, they carefully select the APC men they can easily bully. Rufyy is a pessimist par excellence, only he is honest and capable! To him, all Nigerians are corrupt and unpatriotic – except himself! Abati was my hall mate at Awo Postgraduate Hall, UI… He always loves to play smart (but) I think an average Nigerian knows that he is biased.

He is a PDP card-carrying member. Seun Okinbaloye is worse, despite the fact that the Finance Minister has said it times without number that the right question to ask is ‘where would Nigeria have been if the (Tinubu) reforms were not introduced’ and NOT ‘is your life better now than it was in 2023?’ Okinbaloye is aware of the 33 trillion paper-money printed, the huge amount owed foreign airlines, and the less than four billion dollars in the foreign reserves account.

Yet, Seun will have none of that! He is in the habit of parading statistics just to discredit the government.

The ones that favour the government are downplayed! Hardly will you see Seun ask the right follow-up questions from the opposition. Tinubu needs to strengthen his information machinery in all its ramifications. – Rev. Canon Dr. Kayode Abegunde.

Can anyone or organization in this country have the media in their pocket? I ask this question as someone who has spent almost 50 years in the media and who has done only media job all his life.

But I look at media relations in this country and ask myself: how can these guys be so dumb? All the attacks on opponents and critics will be useless after the President leaves office.

Also read: Coalition Defends NSCDC Commandant-General, Rejects Calls for His Removal Over Minna Detainee Deaths

Where is Buhari’s press value today? It is all gone! Where is Femi Adesina? And where is Garba Sheu? Government media minders are lazy; they are not deep enough; they focus on fighting political opponents and critics and once the government they serve disappears, they, too, will disappear with it! They do not bother to convince anyone; they just shout at us and think that is press relations! They should understudy Ogbuefi Nwokedi and Tunji Oseni! – Olowo Adebola.

 

(Published in the ON THE LORD’S DAY column in the SUNDAY TRIBUNE newspaper edition of Sunday, 20 September, 2026).

66 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Trending News