Connect with us

Opinion

Fubara: Go, going…

Published

on

Fubara

The Rivers godfatherism crisis highlights tensions between political patrons and protégés as governance, legality and stability come under strain

adron lemon friday

A one-time presidential aspirant in the United States was asked, if he loses the primaries, whether he would accept to be the running mate to the victor, but he quipped: “I hate all vices, including the vice-president!”

Also read: Governor Fubara Secures APC Backing as Impeachment Looms

I, too, hate all vices, the vices of godfathers and godsons inclusive! We should not condemn one without condemning the other since both are two sides of the same coin.

In the Nigerian political system of today, it is a kind of willing seller and willing buyer market.

In a similar fashion, when we condemn vote-buying, we must also not forget to condemn vote-selling.

There can be no vote-buying if there are no willing vote-sellers.

It fits perfectly what economists call the law of demand and supply.

Both legs must stand before the law can work.

I am not unmindful, though, of the argument that one can be a victim of the other, but victimhood should not totally absolve anyone of blame if we admit that everyone has a responsibility, and duty, to act as an agent of change if we are to stand any chance of building a just and egalitarian society.

The victim, like Karl Marx posits in the opening words of The Communist Manifesto, must understand that he has nothing but his chains to lose. He has a duty, and a price to pay, if he must move in that direction. Otherwise…

Nothing exists that does not serve a function or purpose; otherwise, it would not exist in the first place.

Look around and see if you can find one such thing that is not serving this or that purpose and for this or that person.

What you abhor or adjure is what someone else embraces and enjoys.

When governments were pulling no stops to wipe out marijuana use was when Peter Tosh sang “Legalize it, and I will advertise it!”

Some political theorists posit that even corruption exists to perform some (inescapable) functions; otherwise, there would be no corruption.

How many traffic offenders in Lagos state, for instance, will choose to go the way of the law and have their vehicle impounded, go for psychiatric test, and then pay a whopping some of money when they can easily part with a paltry sum as bribe and go their way?

So, when prescribed penalties for minor offences are stiff, we inadvertently create loopholes for law enforcement agents to exploit, not to enrich the State but for their own selfish benefits.

I have heard people quote Jesus Christ (specifically in Matthew 5:25 – 26 and Luke 12:58) to kind of support this; akin to how Antonio, William Shakespeare’s character in The Merchant of Venice (Act 1, Scene 3), described Shylock as “an evil soul producing holy witness”

And Jesus said: “Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.

Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou has paid the uttermost farthing.” (Matthew 5: 25 – 26, King James Version). Oh-ooo! So who does that?

Most godfathers are taken in by the deceit of their godsons; it is impossible to believe that anyone will back another person for high office if he knew he would be stabbed in the back afterwards.

Many godsons are like Shylock, in Shakespeare’s work quoted above, who use “piety for deceitful purposes”.

And like Anthonio warned his friend Bassanio concerning Shylock, they are “much like rotten apples with a goodly outside.”

I doubt if Nyesom Wike would have supported Siminalayi Fubara if he knew that what he has turned out to be is the kind of person the Rivers state governor is!

Is there anything good with godfathers insisting on choosing their successors? The answer is both “Yes” and “No.”

Yes, because this is a practice not limited or restricted to politics; even in the private sector, it is widely practised.

In social clubs, alma mater organisations, it is the same thing.

Successors are selected well before time and are groomed to take office; and this is well-known to everyone.

To ensure continuity.

To ensure that the right hands are those allowed to take over.

Sometimes if you allow for so-called level-playing ground, the best candidate may not emerge.

As Jesus Christ again said in Luke 16: 8: “And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” (King James Version).

Why is this so? According to a preacher, it is because the children of this world “are most times more intentional.”

While the children of light are still prevaricating and counting the cost, their wordly counterparts would have quickly made up their mind and seized the initiative.

Before anyone could say “Jack Robinson”, they would have grabbed it, snatched it, and run with it! Does that sound familiar?

So, if the purpose of godfatherism is to ensure continuity, prevent the unworthy from grabbing, snatching, and running with it, so as to ensure that good governance and the dividends of democracy percolate the polity, then, it can be looked upon with favourable eyes.

But even at that, a pool of the best candidates must be allowed to contest and contend. And the process must be transparent, fair and just.

Let it not be a one-man decision or an imposition. Worse, it must not be the imposition of someone who cannot emerge as one of the best in a free and fair contest.

And the purpose must not be for godson to cover the odious tracts of godfather or pander to his vainglorious wishes in such a way that the very purpose of good governance itself will be defeated.

In other words, godfatherism becomes an aberration and an anathema where the best candidate does not emerge; where it is an imposition; where the objective or goal is not continuity for good governance but pandering to the wishes of the godfather, good or bad; and where the interests of the governed are meant to take the back seat, if any at all.

The problem of most godfather-godson relationships in Nigeria the Rivers State example inclusive is that they fail most or all of the litmus tests stated above.

So, the blame must be spread evenly across godfathers and godsons.

A man who, with eyes wide open, climbs the back of a tiger only to think of disembarking on his own terms without considering the consequences cannot, in my view, be reckoned with as a man of wisdom or integrity.

Agreement is agreement, they say, and even among thieves there is nobility.

In my opinion, Fubara knew and planned from Day One not to honour whatever agreement he was entering into with Wike; his interest and goal was simply for the latter to railroad him into office as governor.

Use-and-dump! Wike will have none of that! Armageddon!

This is why Rivers state is on the boil.

The state is said to have a chequered history of godsons betraying their godfathers; yet, they have not learnt any lesson.

Instead, they have taken it as given.

That must be the reason why efforts, up to the presidential level, to help bring peace to that state have floundered.

Is violence in their blood? Is “wahala” in their DNA?

Some actions of Fubara make me cast a ponderous look at the “short-man devil” again and again.

Wike’s actions, obviously, suggest he made a very bad choice of a horse to back and should have himself to blame.

Some have said this is Karma knocking on Wike’s door!

I marveled when Fubara chose to run the state with only 3 or 4 legislators of the state House of Assembly supporting him, passing budgets, screening and approving appointees.

That is egregious.

He bulldozed the state House of Assembly, pretending he wanted to rebuild it! Wasteful!

We operate a democracy and separation of powers between the three arms of government the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary is one of its fulcrums.

According to Baron de Montesquieu’s theory of separation of powers, which has gained universal acceptance and applicability, each of the three arms of government are equal and co-terminus.

In addition, the Legislature performs oversight functions over the Executive arm of government.

The Legislature cannot be so denied and we still claim to be a democracy. Tinpot dictator!

The Rivers state legislators are right to insist that no state governor may operate a budget not passed by the state House of Assembly.

But since the budget in operation in Rivers state at the moment is the one approved by the National Assembly for the state of emergency period, and the budget is still expected to run till later this year, I submit that the Rivers state legislators should get hold of the budget and scrupulously scrutinise it to ensure that it is what Fubara is implementing.

Any deviation from that budget by Fubara without legislative approval is illegal.

Therefore, any impeachment move against Fubara and his deputy on the issue of operating a budget without legislative approval should be held in abeyance for now.

But on any other alleged impeachable offences, the legislators are free to act.

The last time the House moved against Fubara, a political solution by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, couched in the form of a six-month state of emergency, saved the day.

But if, ultimately, a political solution fails in Rivers state, then, the law should be allowed to take its due course.

FEEDBACK

It is not only airports that are proliferated in NIgeria; universities, too, are proliferated.

This happens because we don’t have effective national planning.

So, we have the proliferation of everything. Even states and local governments do not often plan things properly.

When was the last time you heard of a national development plan? – Wale Ajao.

The threat of President Bola Tinubu to the governors (on local government autonomy) was just a facade.

I will not be surprised if the situation continues, with the governors disobeying the Supreme Court judgment and no action is taken by the President to sanction the governors, moreso now that we are entering 2026, the year of political campaigns all over the place for the 2027 general elections! The president needs the governors, and vice versa, to retain their political offices in the 2027 general elections. – Dr. JF Olukotun.

The US airstrike (on terrorist groups in Nigeria) is a welcome development.

It is not humiliation.

While I do not know the intentions of Donald Trump, there is nothing wrong in collaboration to fight a common enemy.

Also read: Peter Obi claims Nigeria’s democracy is collapsing amid Fubara suspension

In the past, Nigeria had led the fight against common enemies in other countries. Examples abound! – Kola Oloye.

66 / 100 SEO Score

Opinion

Nigeria Must Sustain Power Rotation Arrangement, Says Babarinsa

Published

on

Veteran journalist and Chairman of Gaskia Media Limited, Dare Babarinsa, has called on Nigeria to sustain its informal power-rotation arrangement between the North and South, arguing that the system remains important for political stability and national unity.

adron lemon friday

Babarinsa said the presidency should return to the North in 2031 and move back to the South in 2039, maintaining that the arrangement should remain in place until Nigerians develop a more suitable alternative.

He made the position known on Monday, November 2, while delivering a public lecture at the Press Centre, Iyaganku, Ibadan, as part of activities marking the 60th anniversary of the Oyo State Council of the Nigerian Union of Journalists (NUJ).

Speaking on the theme of Nigeria’s political arrangement and the future of the media, Babarinsa acknowledged criticisms of the rotational presidency, particularly from those who believe that every qualified Nigerian should be allowed to contest for the highest political office regardless of region.

However, he argued that Nigeria’s political circumstances make power rotation a practical arrangement for maintaining stability, even if it may not always produce the most suitable candidate.

According to him, the arrangement emerged from political negotiations ahead of the return to civilian rule in 1999, following the deaths of former military Head of State, General Sani Abacha, and the presumed winner of the June 12, 1993 presidential election, Chief Moshood Abiola.

Babarinsa recalled that after Abacha’s death in 1998, General Abdulsalami Abubakar assumed leadership and introduced a transition programme aimed at ending military rule by May 29, 1999.

He said the death of Abiola, who was detained by the military government, created concerns about the political future of the Yoruba people and influenced discussions over the region that should produce Nigeria’s first civilian president after military rule.

The journalist disclosed that he was among members of the Idile Oodua resistance movement who supported the position that the South-West should produce the first president under the new democratic arrangement.

He said he was subsequently mandated by members of the group to consult the late Ooni of Ife, Oba Okunade Sijuwade, who told him that traditional rulers across the country were also holding consultations on the matter.

According to Babarinsa, the discussions contributed to the emergence of two Yoruba presidential candidates in the 1999 election: former President Olusegun Obasanjo of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Chief Olu Falae, who contested under the Alliance for Democracy and All Peoples Party coalition.

He also recalled that former Vice-President Alex Ekwueme disagreed with the arrangement, arguing that the South-East could not be bound by an agreement reached principally between political interests in the North and South-West.

Babarinsa said he agreed with Ekwueme’s interpretation that power should rotate between the North and South rather than among the six geopolitical zones.

He explained that the arrangement had continued through successive administrations, including the emergence of former President Goodluck Jonathan following the death of President Umaru Yar’Adua and the subsequent election of former President Muhammadu Buhari.

With President Bola Tinubu currently in office, Babarinsa argued that the existing arrangement should be sustained, with power returning to the North after the current administration and subsequently moving back to the South.

To support his argument, he compared Nigeria’s power-sharing arrangement with the confessional system adopted in Lebanon in 1943, under which key political offices were allocated to different religious communities to promote political balance.

He said Nigeria could learn from such arrangements, insisting that political compromises sometimes become necessary in countries with diverse ethnic, religious and regional interests.

“If we intend to keep Nigeria, then we need to make this special arrangement work until future generations are able to make a better arrangement,” he said.

Babarinsa reflects on Ibadan’s journalism legacy

Beyond the political question, Babarinsa used the lecture to examine the history of journalism in Ibadan and the contribution of the city to the development of Nigeria’s media industry.

He described Ibadan as a major centre of political and media influence, noting that its newspapers had produced some of the country’s most prominent journalists, editors and public commentators.

He recalled the establishment of the Nigerian Tribune in 1949 by Chief Obafemi Awolowo and the creation of the Sketch newspaper group in 1964 by the then Premier of the Western Region, Chief Ladoke Akintola.

He also highlighted the contributions of prominent journalists, including Felix Adenaike, Segun Osoba and Peter Ajayi, whom he described as the Three Musketeers of the Nigerian media during the Second Republic.

According to him, the trio wielded considerable influence in the industry through their leadership positions at the Tribune and Sketch newspaper groups.

Babarinsa also acknowledged the contributions of former journalists and columnists, including Alhaji Lateef Jakande, Chief Bola Ige, Chief Olabisi Onabanjo, Aare Afe Babalola and Dr Tai Solarin.

He said the history of journalism in Ibadan was closely connected to the political development of the country, recalling the debates on issues such as the International Monetary Fund loan, diarchy and rotational presidency.

The journalist urged members of the profession to preserve that tradition by ensuring that the media remained a platform for informed public debate and the promotion of ideas capable of strengthening Nigeria.

Media organisations urged to embrace digital transformation

Addressing the challenges facing the industry, Babarinsa warned that traditional media organisations must urgently adapt to the changing media environment or risk losing relevance.

He said the internet had disrupted conventional news production and distribution, creating new opportunities while also allowing unregulated online platforms to compete with established media organisations.

According to him, several traditional newspapers have established online platforms, but their digital presence has not translated into the level of revenue needed to sustain their operations.

He cited the decline of once-dominant media organisations such as the Daily Times and Sketch as examples of the changes that have reshaped the industry.

Babarinsa recalled that Sketch newspaper had a daily circulation of about 60,000 copies during the 1970s and 1980s but had since ceased publication, with its former premises converted into a shopping mall.

He also expressed concern over declining newspaper readership among young Nigerians, warning that a society with an increasingly uninformed population could struggle to appreciate and defend democracy.

The Gaskia Media chairman said media organisations must follow their audiences into the digital space and develop business models that can sustain quality journalism.

He disclosed that his organisation had also decided to strengthen its online presence through the publication of a digital magazine, beginning with an online news blog.

Journalists urged to defend democracy and uphold professional standards

Babarinsa further reminded journalists of their role in Nigeria’s democratic development, particularly during the struggle against military rule.

He said members of the Nigerian press had suffered imprisonment, exile and other forms of persecution in the fight for the restoration of democracy, with some journalists paying the ultimate price.

He maintained that journalists therefore had a responsibility to protect the democratic system and ensure that the country’s electoral processes remained credible.

With the 2027 general election approaching, he urged media professionals to play their part by providing accurate information and encouraging informed public participation.

The Independent National Electoral Commission has scheduled the presidential and National Assembly elections for January 16, 2027, while governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections are fixed for February 6, 2027.

Babarinsa said journalists must remain committed to the fundamental principles of the profession, stressing that factual accuracy should remain central to news reporting while allowing room for responsible advocacy.

He urged journalists to advocate for the national interest, rather than restrict their work to positions that may be politically convenient.

Calls for greater inclusion of young journalists and women

Looking towards the future, Babarinsa called for greater opportunities for young journalists and women in the profession, saying the industry must deliberately prepare a new generation of media leaders.

He cited the careers of prominent journalists who assumed major editorial and management positions at relatively young ages, including Peter Enahoro, Olusegun Osoba, Yemi Ogunbiyi, Yakubu Mohammed, Ray Ekpu and Adamu Ciroma.

According to him, the history of Nigerian journalism demonstrates that young professionals have consistently played important roles in driving the industry forward.

He urged established media practitioners to listen to younger colleagues, particularly members of Generation Z, and create opportunities for them to contribute to the future of the profession.

Babarinsa also called for more deliberate efforts to bring women into leadership positions, noting that the industry could no longer remain dominated by men.

He expressed optimism about the future of journalism, despite concerns over poor remuneration, declining newspaper circulation and competition from digital platforms.

The veteran journalist concluded by urging the profession to embrace change, drawing attention to the need for innovation in newspaper production, technology and audience engagement.

Quoting a principle he attributed to Professor Ladipo Adamolekun, Babarinsa said the media industry must adapt to changing realities to remain relevant.

“Adapt or Die!” he declared.

67 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

News

Bolawole Questions Nigeria’s Democratic Future

Published

on

Bolawoe

Bola Bolawole questions Nigeria’s democratic future, citing poverty, illiteracy, corruption and political rivalry as obstacles to credible elections

adron lemon friday

(more…)

72 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Opinion

Why Nigeria needs the All-Nigeria Rotary Peace Summit

Published

on

Rotary

 The All-Nigeria Rotary Peace Summit will examine how good governance, justice and equity can help Nigeria build lasting peace

(more…)

adron lemon friday

62 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Trending News