Connect with us

Opinion

A Confused President, Confusing People

Published

on

President

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s electricity promise has come under fresh examination as his administration grapples with persistent power challenges more than three years into his tenure

adron lemon friday

THERE are some things obvious about President Bola Ahmed Tinubu that are so weird that they are unbelievable. They are like spells cast on Nigerians – they believe Tinubu with all the discrepancies that have become his badges of honour.

Also read: Tinubu congratulates Group Chief Executive of Oando PLC Adewale Tinubu at 59

What can we say about Tinubu that would be certain and when tested can be confirmed as true, reliable, useful for reaching a decision on Tinubu. We have come to know nothing about the man we call President.

It is. sometimes uncertain if Tinubu knows anything about himself. Is the much-vilified Tinubu the same as the one who is President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria? The one who speaks for Nigerians, though there is a lot of quietness around him?

Each week is spent in denying promises that Tinubu made on the discovery that he cannot fulfilled those promises in a 10-year tenure. He must deny the promises.

An example is electricity which Tinubu explicitly promised. He anchored his re-election on it. Tinubu asked his audience at a meeting in Lagos, in December 2022, not to re-elect him if he failed to provide electricity.

Electricity supply deteriorated to a point that the immediate past Minister of Power was openly called “Minister of Darkness”.

He is also famously remembered for accusing Nigerians of wasting electricity by not turning off our air-conditioners and refrigerators.

Bayo Onanuga, presidential media adviser, who is likely to be seen these days praising state governments for using the generous federal allocations from Tinubu in developing the States, is very generous in recounting how Tinubu is developing Nigeria. He is quickly running out of ideas.

He has never been happier than in the past week when he believed he had navigated his sinking skills out of the electricity quagmire.

“Tinubu did not promise anyone 24 hours electricity,” Onanuga announced on television.

Triumphant, Onanuga finished off by paraphrasing Tinubu’s quote which all of them in the presidency had forgotten until the public nudged them into a frightening realisation that electricity was a major area of woeful failure.

From December 2022 when Tinubu made the promise till June 2026 it was not an issue. Tinubu thought his poverty alignment programmes would have hammered the people to the point that electricity would be of little importance in their lives.

Did Tinubu say, “If I don’t give you constant electricity for four years, when I come back for a second term, don’t vote for me.”? He did. The shock on the faces those listening to him showed that they never believed him.

At the time he made this promise, Tinubu was so desperate that he could have promised anything. He is back to that desperate mode.

He is throwing anything into a 2027 election that is slipping out of his control.

No conditions were attached to Tinubu providing “constant electricity”. If “constant electricity” did mean “24 hours of electricity” what does it mean?

How many How many hours of electricity are we getting daily?

All Onanuga could do was to ramble about meters, new electricity law, poor infrastructure and challenges of gas supply.

Obviously, the master strategist Tinubu knew nothing about the issues of the electricity sector. He found out and did something that shocked Nigerians.

Tinubu detached the presidential villa from the national power system and built a power system for himself – by all means possible. Several government establishments are following the example, including the Ministry of Power.

When the national grid collapses, Tinubu is no longer affected. When we call his attention to rising costs of living, killing costs of generating our own electricity with fuel and diesel purchased at outrageous costs, they blame the closure of the Strait of Hormuz or manufacture a more compounding excuse.

An Onanuga who lives on a budget that makes the cost of living irrelevant, dismisses our pains, claiming that we were bellyaching.

Nigeria was liveable, according to a Kenyan who possibly lives in the Rift Valley.

With the millions who support the President, there wasn’t one Nigerian from who Onanuga could extract a testimony of the bounteous goodness of Tinubu’s administration.

When Onanuga “opened his phone” on Arose TV, the fuller Tinubu quote stared at him. “By all means necessary, you must have electricity and you will not pay for estimated bill again.

A promise made, is a promise kept. If I don’t provide you with 24 hours electricity, and I come for second term, don’t vote for me”.

Onanuga panicked.

He decided to mutilate the quote so that he could delve into poor electricity infrastructure while Tinubu never mentioned any reason why he would not provide electricity.

Why was Onanuga labouring to deceive himself? Nigerians know what Tinubu told them. Tinubu must be ashamed of Onanuga about now.

There is a difference between failure and lying about a promise. For Onanuga, they mean the same thing.

Tinubu’s desperation is a child’s play compared to 2023. Mrs Remi Tinubu is on also centre stage insulting Nigerians for not being more industrious by engaging in street trading – prohibited in most States – which must have been how she made the billions she boasts the family has.

She wants Nigerians to engage in roasting corns, frying kuliku and survive on other menial jobs for which she claimed to have made billions of Naira available.

How does she get the billions and how does she allocate it? The money is hers. It’s hers to spend as she wills.

One thing she should desist from is insulting Nigerians. We know what to do under a President who knows what to do.

Are those she dashes jeeps being rewarded for their enterprise in roasting corn?

When Nigerians are lifting themselves up from the oppressions of the Tinubus we are blamed for searching for our survival when we have a President who cannot protect us, cannot provide for us, and largely behaves as if we are an inconvenience to him.

Tinubu, you can keep your electricity, by all means possible. It seems that 2027 is coming too fast. Onanuga will need more time to tell us about Tinubu – the Tinubu he does not even know.

Finally…
MAJOR-GENERAL Rabe Abubakar died in captivity with his kidnappers still free, with crocodile tears that the government is shading over the death.

There is a lot of deceit in the management of deaths, whether in battle or in “peace” time. If the General was too big to be rescued, what about thousands of “ordinary” people that kidnappers are still holding?

In this group are the elderly, women, children – the vulnerable as they are called? What tears are the government shedding for them? When will they be rescued?

THE deceit continues with the positioning of state police as the elixir to insecurity in Nigeria. If state police fail, as it could with the rush in implementing it, Tinubu’s docility and mismanagement of security can be explained as an indication of the enormity of the problem.

No matter how he fails, no matter how badly he fares, he must be seemed as infallible.

KILLINGS continue in Borno, Plateau, Benue, Kaduna, Katsina and Zamfara, where the state governments spend a lot of resources making excuses for the killers.

It is no longer surprising that governments offer no hope that the killers would be apprehended and punished for killing Nigerians, and increasingly, in the most brutal manners.

HUNGER is driving thousands of Nigerians to engage in propagating the sugar-coated achievements of the Tinubu administration.

Here is a government that has achieved so much that its latest research is on why hunger persists in the land.

MY sympathies go to all families that lost members in the past week to bandits, particularly the family of All Progressives Congress, APC, in Koko Besse Local Government Area of Kebbi State, Alhaji Muhammadu Besse, who was abducted with his friend, Muhammed Maibarga, said to have died weeks earlier in the bush.

Also readJubril Adewale Tinubu at 59: A Celebration of a Generous Spirit

THE Nigeria Democratic Congress, NDC, was on Friday ruled “unregistered party” by the same court that ordered INEC to register it. All hands should be on deck to see our democracy survive as we look up to the courts again.

47 / 100 SEO Score

Opinion

Yahaya Bello: Funding the Structure, Not the Pocket Is the Winning Formula in Kogi

Published

on

Yahaya Bello

By Seun Oloketuyi,

adron lemon friday

Former Kogi State Governor Alhaji Yahaya Bello believes one of the biggest lessons from his political experience is that money alone does not win elections. For him, where that money is directed can make all the difference.

Also read: Gbenga Daniel Urges Stronger Security at Freedom Online 7th Annual Lecture

Bello shares this perspective in Seun Oloketuyi’s forthcoming book, How to Win an Election in Nigeria, where he reflects on the political strategy behind his electoral successes in Kogi State.

According to him, campaigns should focus less on handing money directly to voters and more on building a strong political structure capable of mobilising support at the grassroots. “Fund your structure, not the voter’s pocket,” Bello said.
He argued that last-minute cash distribution should not be mistaken for a winning strategy, stressing that genuine political strength is built long before election day.

For Bello, the people and networks supporting a candidate are more important than simply having money to spend when voting is around the corner.

His experience in Kogi, he said, showed the importance of having a well-organised structure that could translate political support into actual votes.

Bello’s reflections offer a different perspective on the role of money in Nigerian elections, particularly the difference between spending to build political strength and spending simply to influence voters at the last minute.

Also read: Gbenga Daniel Urges Stronger Security at Freedom Online 7th Annual Lecture

More of his thoughts on electoral strategy, grassroots politics and the lessons from his years in Kogi politics are featured in Seun Oloketuyi’s How to Win an Election in Nigeria, scheduled for release on September 6.

66 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Opinion

The Zamfara Masterminds: Loyalty, Structure and the Unstoppable Engine of the 2027 APC Campaign

Published

on

Zamfara

 

adron lemon friday

​By Adeola Agoro,

 

​When in 2011 Abdulaziz Yari became the governorship candidate for the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) in Zamfara State just after one term of Alhaji Mahmud Aliyu Shinkafi, many political observers were not surprised.

Also read: Governor Dauda Lawal woos investors, highlights Zamfara’s economic opportunities at CEO Forum

​Although Mahmud Shinkafi, former deputy governor to His Excellency Senator Ahmed Sani Yerima was one of the few deputy governors to ever be solidly supported by their former bosses to succeed them in 2007, political realignments and party shifts altered the dynamic relationship after a short while in office.

​So it was no surprise when Abdulaziz Yari, a deeply loyal protégé and key political strategist of Yerima got the party ticket and won the Zamfara governorship election in April 2011.

​Over the years, both Yerima and Yari have worked together to make the state a formidable political stronghold and a reference point for administrative continuity.

​Unlike most states carved out of older states, which often grapple with initial structural hurdles, Zamfara State, since its creation from the old Sokoto State in October 1996 and its democratic consolidation under Senator Yerima’s pioneer executive tenure starting in 1999, has continued to stand tall and maintain a distinct, independent presence on the political map of Nigeria.

​The Political Strengths of Yerima and Yari

​Senator Ahmed Sani Yerima (The Godfather & Stakeholder Mobilizer): A consummate strategist and the undisputed patriarch of grassroots mobilization in Northern Nigeria, Yerima’s ability to build bridges across political, traditional and religious institutions gives him an extraordinary capacity to unite diverse interest groups and command deep-rooted loyalty at ground zero.

​Senator Abdulaziz Yari (The Master Tactical Administrator & DG): A seasoned political organizer who served as ANPP State Chairman, House of Representatives member, two-term Governor of Zamfara State (2011–2019) and Chairman of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF), Yari brings fierce operational discipline, tactical executive coordination and national consensus-building skills to the table.

​That both men who are undisputed political gladiators are now positioned at the core of the 2027 APC Presidential Campaign Council, with His Excellency Senator Abdulaziz Yari serving as Director-General and His Excellency Senator Ahmed Sani Yerima serving as Stakeholder Mobilizer, is a masterstroke in political planning, strategic alignment and electoral organization.

​To understand the political weight behind the All Progressives Congress (APC) Presidential Campaign Council, one must look at the unique narrative of Zamfara State – a political domain built on deep-rooted loyalty, strategic leadership and administrative continuity.

​When the political landscape was redrawn during Nigeria’s return to democracy in 1999, Zamfara stood ready to chart its own course.

Under the executive leadership of His Excellency, Senator Ahmed Sani Yerima, the state established a distinct identity, proving that it could stand tall, independent and politically formidable on the national stage.

​The Unbroken Bond

​Long before stepping into executive leadership, Abdulaziz Yari had built a reputation as an exceptionally loyal party administrator and key strategist.

Throughout these roles, Yari viewed Yerima not just as a leader, but as a political mentor.

​Unlike many political dynamics across the country where mentor-protégé relationships fray over time, the bond between Yerima and Yari has remained unbroken.

Their connection is built on deep-rooted mutual respect: Yari has consistently maintained absolute loyalty to his mentor, while Yerima has always respected Yari’s sharp administrative mind and organizational capacity.

​A Strategic Masterstroke for 2027

​Today, the inclusion of these two formidable leaders at the core of the APC Presidential Campaign Council brings that exact same spirit of loyalty, structure and strategic brilliance to the national stage.

​With His Excellency, Senator Abdulaziz Yari bringing his tactical discipline, administrative efficiency and nationwide consensus-building skills to the campaign as Director-General and His Excellency, Senator Ahmed Sani Yerima deploying his legendary grassroots influence and bridge-building capabilities as Stakeholder Mobilizer, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s re-election campaign possesses an unbeatable leadership engine.

​While Yari coordinates the national operational machinery as Campaign DG, Yerima engages high-level stakeholders, political blocs, traditional institutions and grassroots groups across all 36 states.

​Their combined track record, vast national networks and deep popularity bring an unbeatable structural shield to the presidential campaign, guaranteeing a sweeping, decisive victory for the APC.

Also read: Governor Dauda Lawal woos investors, highlights Zamfara’s economic opportunities at CEO Forum

​Their story stands as living proof that when loyalty, strength, administrative genius and mutual respect come together, political success naturally follows.

70 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Opinion

Has Tinubu lost his grip on the Nigerian media?

Published

on

Tinubu

 

adron lemon friday

By Bola BOLAWOLE,

 

You must have heard it said that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has the Nigerian media in his pockets. You may want to wonder how “deep” Tinubu’s pockets are that he can swallow all Nigerian media organizations! In some sense, that idiomatic expression can be true: Tinubu belongs to the tribe of a few Nigerians with “deep” pockets; meaning that they have near-limitless financial resources and clout with which they can buy or influence anything and anyone. Don’t forget that even the Scriptures say “money answereth all things” (Ecclesiastes 10: 19 KJV).

Also read: Governor Dauda Lawal And The New Zamfara State

You will also remember that a similar thing was said of the late MKO Abiola, winner of the annulled June 12, 1993 presidential election, the freest and fairest in Nigeria’s chequered history, but which was annulled for inexplicable reasons by military dictator, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida.

But is media ownership not too diffused in Nigeria to allow an individual to put the entire Nigeria media in his or her pockets – including even social media? Are proprietary interests not too conflicting and competing for that to happen? Are today’s Nigerian journalists not too educated, too enlightened, too sophisticated, too urbane, and too professional for a single individual to pocket all of them? What of ideological differences, with many journalists fiercely rejecting pecuniary, “brown envelop” and yellow journalism even at the point of the bayonet?

Many of today’s journalists are proud species and professionals to the core who are committed to their watchdog role of holding the government accountable to the people, regardless of whose ox is gored and without exercising any fear or favor. Yes, there are “white legs” in every profession but Professor Richard A. Joseph’s “prebendalism”, where sentiments such as religion, ethnicity, race, personal relations, and such other sense of entitlements trump merit will hardly allow for a single individual to pocket the media in its entirety.

I got thinking along these lines after reading two of my highly respected columns last Sunday. One was Sonala Olumhense’s “Sonala Olumhense Syndicated” titled “The 2027 election is a survey on stupidity” published on the back page of the Sunday PUNCH newspaper of August 30, 2026.

It was in a very, very bad taste. Sonala, as the Editorial Page editor of The GUARDIAN newspaper, had invited me to the Editorial Board of the then self-proclaimed (and justifiably so!) ‘Flagship” of the Nigerian media. In fact, my first-ever publications in any newspaper were in The GUARDIAN under Sonala’s editorship. They were titled “If I should die unemployed” and “How not to plead for prisoners of conscience.”

Sonala’s line of argument in his piece referenced above hurts, but not the choices he made because he is entitled to them – although, in the same breath, he had denied other Nigerians the right to make their own choices! That faux pas did nothing to diminish Sonala in my estimation, but I felt sorry he went overboard in his desperation to pull Tinubu down but, in the end, promoted vacuity when he said “When there is the kind of menace that APC represents, CREDIBLE OPPOSITION IS ANYONE ELSE (my emphasis) on the ballot.” No sir!

The second of my “Sunday tonic” that got me thinking was Idowu Akinlotan’s “PALLADIUM” on the back page of THE NATION newspaper of Sunday, August 30, 2026 titled “Osun, 2027: APC contends with hostile media.” Reviewing the Ekiti and Osun off-season governorship elections, the one won by APC and the other lost by it, Akinlotan concluded that the Nigerian media was (has become) anti-APC/Tinubu. Can that be true? When and where did it start? Was the media at any point pro-APC/Tinubu? What went wrong? First, snippets from Akinlotan’s piece before we draw our own conclusions:

“Hard as they tried, leaders of the All Progressives Congress (APC) failed to penetrate the reinforced armour of media establishments opposed to their electoral successes since 2023. The ruling party’s fortunes have not changed. Most loathe the ruling party. That the APC won in 2023 without their help and despite their opposition has left the said media enraged. As the party prepares for the 2027 campaigns, and given the unyielding posture of the said media houses, it must by now have made up its mind to go it alone. The party is unable to win new media friends, and has perhaps given up.

“To make a headway (in the) next polls, it must first reflect on the deeply contrasting Ekiti and Osun governorship elections. On June 20 and August 15, the two elections were conducted, barely two months apart, with few intervening variables, and in the same Yoruba region. If it hopes to win next year, it should review newspaper publications of the period June 21 and 22; and August 16 and 17, all representing before and after the poll reports. The media reports were both revealing and troubling.

“Before the Ekiti poll, the papers displayed a sense of resignation, warning darkly about the consequences of rigging the poll or denying the electorate the right to elect a governor of their choice. But the poll went seamlessly, the outcome predictable weeks before, as former governors of the state queued behind the incumbent, Biodun Oyebanji. For media houses which had repeatedly rhapsodised democracy and freedom of choice unfettered by electoral shenanigans, it was expected they would capture the popular mood and abjure the projection of their beliefs and prejudices on the electorate. From casting doubt on the integrity of the polls in their June 20 reports, the media went on, a day after the poll on June 21, to feign objectivity that Mr. Oyebanji was Ieading in the vote count amid vote-buying allegations, unconvincing turnout, and other insinuated malfeasances. There always had to be a but!”

Mr. Akinlotan was right to a great extent. I had written off the Ekiti election, ever before it was conducted, as a coronation of sorts because the opposition, embroiled at the national and local levels by court cases, INEC deregistration threats, internal squabbles and inability to form a united front, did not stand a chance in the election.

The media grudge that Akinlotan spoke about here was actually visible.

But when it came to Osun where opposition Gov. Ademola Adeleke was giving APC a hell of trouble, the opposition media, if I may call it that, came alive, and when Adeleke was coasting home to victory, they celebrated it the way they never celebrated Oyebanji in Ekiti; same when Adeleke was eventually announced as the winner of the election.

Let me start by saying that Akinlotan’s advice that Tinubu should ignore the “opposition” media and go it alone will not serve the president any good.

A better option is to find out what went wrong with a man who courted and cultivated the media, and who was loved and supported by it, and why the reverse is now the case – if we are to take Akinlotan’s narrative as the gospel truth.

Besides, enough evidence has emerged that elections are not won here on social media or by newspaper endorsements.

One: Tinubu started on a wrong footing with the first appointment of a spokesperson. The guy was clearly a misfit for the office. Two: The initial in-fighting within Tinubu’s media team seriously harmed and hampered their performance and dented their image. Three: The truculence of some of Tinubu’s presidential aides, instead of being accommodating and conciliatory, offended and isolated many of their professional colleagues. Four: Some names on Tinubu’s media team embarrass true professionals. Five: Has Tinubu’s media team been proactive enough? How often, how persistently, do they reach out to their professional colleagues with vital information? They should constantly court and cultivate their professional colleagues and not expect it to be the other way round.

Historically, the media is adversarial. It started by fighting the Colonial government for the country’s Independence. I do not think the media has totally purged that advocacy from its bloodline.

It is an aberration when we describe the government and the media as “partners in progress.” The media’s duty is to hold the government accountable to the people by constantly holding government’s feet to the fire – but it should also give kudos when it is richly deserved, just like Babafemi Ojudu did recently on the Lagos-Calabar expressway signature project of the Tinubu administration.

Traditionally, the media supports the underdog. In Osun, Gov. Adeleke was the perceived underdog whereas in Ekiti, the disparate opposition parties were the underdog.

Professionally, the media is sensational. Bad news makes better news. Hence we were taught that when a dog bites a man, it is not news but when a man bites a dog, bedlam! Sensational news sells newspapers better and faster. Ask readers themselves! They determine what they would like to read!

Respectfully, I do not think Akinlotan’s scare-mongering is the right way to go.

Tinubu should instead re-invent his media team to become more conciliatory and accessible to their professional colleagues – be they so-called opposition or friendly media. Engage with them more frequently.

If people are made to see the other side of any issue, many of them will become more supportive and compassionate.

When people are shut out, deliberately or inadvertently, you lose the right to complain that they are hostile.

Besides, dissenting voices oil the wheel of democracy. Effective media relations takes no one as an enemy but as inescapable partners in the same Nigerian project, even if we see things from different or conflicting prisms or perspectives.

Office-holders should always have it at the back of their mind that there is a terminal date to every appointment.

Also read: Governor Dauda Lawal And The New Zamfara State

If in doubt, ask yourself where are the men and women who occupied the office and sat on the same seat that you occupy today? You, too, will become history!

 

(Published in the TREASURES column on the back page of the NEW TELEGRAPH newspaper of Wednesday, 2 September, 2026).

72 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Trending News