The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) presided over by Honourable Justice C. O. Oba sitting in Court 32 has struck out Charge No. FCT/HC/CR/469/2022 filed by Falana & Falana against the Chairman, Zinox Technologies, Leo Stan Ekeh and officials of Technology Distributions Limited, including Mrs. Chioma Ekeh, Chris Eze Ozims, Shade Oyebode, Charles Adigwe and others over an alleged fraud involving a N170m contract with the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS).
This follows a letter dated October 28, 2022 from the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, through the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation (DPP) to Falana & Falana withdrawing the fiat earlier granted them in May 2022 and also directing them to immediately withdraw the said Charge constituted as FCT/HC/CR/469/2022 leveled against Mr. Ekeh and the others, based on the findings that the fiat was obtained on misrepresentation and concealment of material facts by their client, Mr. Benjamin Joseph of Citadel Oracle Concepts Limited.
At the court proceedings on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, Mr. Marshall Abubakar, counsel from the firm of Falana & Falana, who appeared for the prosecution, tried to argue against the instruction and sought adjournment on some flimsy grounds, despite the clear instruction of the AGF contained in the letter to his firm.
However, Mr. Matthew Bukaa (SAN) who appeared for Mr. Ekeh, and the aforementioned staff of Technology Distributions Limited, opposed the application for adjournment and prayed the court to give effect to the unambiguous directive of the AGF to withdraw the charges.
The trial judge, Honourable Justice C. O Oba, after reviewing the certified true copy of the Attorney General’s letter, agreed with the defence counsel, Mr. Bukaa SAN, that there is no legitimate grounds to sustain the charges or grant adjournment and accordingly struck out the charges.
It would be recalled that some recent media publications had published stories indicating that the Federal Government of Nigeria was to prosecute Mr. Ekeh and 12 others over an alleged N170million FIRS contract which Mr. Benjamin Joseph claims was fraudulently executed using the name of his company, Citadel Oracle Concept Limited, without his knowledge and that the Federal Government was accordingly defrauded.
It was also reported that the firm of Falana & Falana, acting for Mr. Benjamin Joseph, applied for and was granted a fiat in May 2022 from the AGF to bring a charge against Mr. Ekeh and 12 others, upon which Mr. Femi Falana filed the purported charge on September 9, 2022.
However, the Attorney General, by a letter dated October 28, 2022, to Falana & Falana withdrew the fiat earlier granted them and directed them to immediately withdraw the charge they filed in court.
The directive came a couple of weeks after the AGF discovered that material information was withheld in the application by Falana & Falana for the fiat allegedly meant to prosecute Ekeh and others. Crucially, Mr. Falana SAN, who had only recently started representing Benjamin Joseph, failed to disclose to the AGF that the FCT High Court presided by Honourable Justice Damlami Senchi had in February 2021 delivered a judgment in Charge No. FCT/HC/CR/244/2018, dismissing as false and malicious the various allegations put forward by Mr. Benjamin Joseph and awarded the sum of N20m against him as damages for false petitioning and to serve as a deterrence to others against false information.
The respected SAN also failed to disclose that his client has refused to be cross-examined since 2018 in an ongoing criminal case (Charge No. CR/216/2016) instituted against him by the Federal Government of Nigeria through the Office of the Inspector General of Police (IGP) based on false information on the same allegations.
Also, it was not disclosed to the AGF that the Nigerian Police Force Headquarters had, by a comprehensive final report dated December 1, 2020, after a thorough review of the facts and investigations of the case, absolved Mr. Ekeh and all the aforementioned persons of any criminal liability in the entire transaction leading to this case, but rather recommended the continuation of the trial of Mr. Benjamin Joseph which began since 2016. Furthermore, the AGF had, by a letter dated June 6, 2022, also directed the Inspector General of Police to prosecute Benjamin Joseph to a logical conclusion.
The said criminal proceedings is still ongoing against Mr. Benjamin Joseph before Honourable Justice Peter Kekemeke of the FCT High Court and comes up on January 24, 2023, for continuation of trial.
There was, therefore, no basis to grant or sustain the fiat to file charges against Mr. Ekeh and the staff of Technology Distributions on the same set of facts and allegations for which Mr. Benjamin Joseph, the petitioner, is currently standing trial for false information. Consequently, the fiat was withdrawn and the Charge struck out on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 by Honourable Justice C. O. Oba sitting in Court 32 of the FCT High Court.
Reacting to the development, a human rights activist, Dr. Niyi Abo, who was present in court on a sidelines as an observer, hailed the judgment, even as he expressed his disappointment at the step taken by Falana & Falana in filing the case against Mr. Ekeh and others without due diligence.
‘‘I think what they want to achieve is to see Mr. Ekeh in the dock just to diminish his stature because from findings, the only sin the man committed is that he founded TD Africa and his company extended an interest-free credit to help a young man to survive, just like he has done for thousands of others partners of TD Africa, some of whom are in court here in sympathy with Mr. Ekeh. ‘‘This further gives vent to the claims that this might be a case of blackmail gone wrong, according to what Benjamin Joseph’s ex-business partner, Princess Kama confirmed in the media herself, that Benjamin Joseph’s grouse is that she did not support him to divert TD Africa’s funds after the FIRS paid them, as well as his alleged attempt to extort money from Mr. Ekeh when he learnt that Mr. Ekeh is a very rich man. I understand Mr. Ekeh and his wife have never met the alleged blackmailer. Does it mean if you transact a business with a company and something goes wrong according to your own estimation, you start calling the Chairman of the company, a distinguished Nigerian and global citizen, a criminal? ‘‘I sincerely think it is very demeaning for a reputable law firm like Falana and Falana to get involved in this. Nigerian lawyers must please upgrade and exhaust simple due diligence on their clients before accepting their briefs. I think that blackmail, due to hard times, is one of the biggest businesses in Africa now. Several compromised media houses are being used by these blackmailers to extort rich men. You can imagine the negative publicity orchestrated by some online media houses against Mr. Ekeh in the past few days on account of this useless case. ‘‘I congratulate Mr. Ekeh for having the guts to follow this fight to the end, and if I were him, I would probably consider a petition to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee against Falana & Falana. He should also take Mr. Benjamin Joseph to the cleaners by taking out court actions against him and his compromised media supporters,’’ Dr. Abo concluded.
Prophet Israel Oladele of the Celestial Church of Christ, Genesis Global International Parish, has unveiled plans for the Luli Prayer Conference 2026, calling on members of the Celestial Church of Christ worldwide to embrace peace, unity and fervent prayers for Nigeria.
The Global Prophet made the announcement during a media briefing in Lagos, where he highlighted the spiritual significance of September 29, the founding day of the Celestial Church of Christ worldwide, describing it as a moment for thanksgiving, renewal and collective intercession.
According to him, this year’s conference will hold on September 29, 2026, at Genesis Global City, Alakuko, Lagos, bringing together Celestials, Christians and people of other faiths for a day of worship and prayer.
Prophet Oladele said the 2026 edition would place particular emphasis on praying for Nigeria as the country approaches another election cycle.
He noted that the church has a divine responsibility to continually seek God’s intervention for the nation’s peace, stability and progress, adding that the conference would extend beyond celebration to become a platform for prayers for Nigeria and the world.
“The Luli Prayer Conference is not just a celebration; it is a divine gathering where we unite in thanksgiving and seek God’s intervention for our nation and humanity,” he said.
The cleric also made a passionate appeal for unity within the Celestial Church of Christ, urging members across different parishes and regions to recognise their shared spiritual heritage.
He stressed that all Celestials are bound together by the legacy of the church’s founder, Reverend Samuel Bilewu Joseph Oshofa, whose vision continues to define the identity of the worldwide church.
According to Prophet Oladele, differences among members should never overshadow the common foundation laid by the founder, as unity remains essential to preserving the church’s mission.
He described Reverend Oshofa’s legacy as a rallying point capable of bringing together Celestials across the globe, regardless of branch, location or personal differences.
Looking ahead, the Global Prophet announced that the 2027 Luli Prayer Conference would coincide with the 80th anniversary of the Celestial Church of Christ, promising what he described as an “explosive” global celebration.
He said preparations for the landmark anniversary would begin immediately after this year’s conference, with activities expected to unite Celestials from around the world in celebrating eight decades of the church’s existence.
Prophet Oladele reiterated that preserving the unity of the Celestial family remains vital to honouring the vision of Reverend S.B.J. Oshofa and ensuring the continued growth of the church worldwide.
He concluded the briefing by urging members to embrace their shared identity, work together in love and continue praying for the peace and prosperity of Nigeria.
Inspector-General of Police Olatunji Disu has urged Nigerians to exercise restraint when recording police officers, describing the indiscriminate filming of officers as “very, very demoralising” to the force.
Disu made the remarks during a meeting with the leadership of the Nigerian Bar Association in Abuja, where he expressed concern that some Nigerians had begun recording police officers in situations beyond their official duties, including while eating at restaurants.
The IGP, however, acknowledged that citizens have a right to record police officers performing their duties in public. He urged Nigerians not to use such recordings to turn police encounters into social-media skits or entertainment.
The comments followed a March 17, 2026 judgment by the Federal High Court in Warri, Delta State, which affirmed the constitutional right of Nigerians to record police officers carrying out their duties in public spaces.
Justice Hyeladzira Nganjiwa, in the judgment, held that citizens could record police officers during stop-and-search operations and other public interactions for purposes including documenting and reporting their conduct.
The court also held that officers should wear visible identification, including their names and force numbers, while carrying out public duties.
The judgment further restrained police officers from harassing, intimidating or arresting citizens simply for recording their activities in public, or confiscating their devices for that reason.
The court awarded ₦5 million in damages over the violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights and a further ₦2 million in litigation costs.
The case was filed by lawyer Maxwell Nosakhare Uwaifo, who said he attempted to record an encounter with men he believed to be police officers during a stop-and-search operation along the Sapele Roundabout while travelling from Benin to Warri in May 2025.
According to the case, the officers allegedly threatened to arrest him and demanded that he stop recording. Uwaifo argued that citizens have a constitutional right to document the conduct of law enforcement officers performing public duties.
The court’s ruling established a distinction between legitimate documentation of police activity and physical interference with police operations. Citizens can record officers carrying out their duties in public, but the right does not extend to obstructing or interfering with lawful police operations.
Following the IGP’s recent comments, the Nigeria Police Force clarified that Disu was not seeking to ban citizens from recording officers.
Force New Media Officer Aliyu Giwa said the concern was about the misuse of recordings, particularly when police encounters are deliberately turned into entertainment or used to ridicule officers.
Giwa said responsible recording could benefit both citizens and police officers by providing evidence in cases of alleged misconduct while also helping to protect officers against false allegations.
The controversy has therefore centred on how the constitutional right should be exercised, rather than whether citizens possess the right to record police officers in public.
Nigeria’s press freedom environment remains under significant pressure, with journalists and other citizens facing arrests, harassment, intimidation and other restrictions on civic participation.
A 2025 Journalism and Civic Space Status Report by the Wole Soyinka Centre for Investigative Journalism documented 245 verified civic-space violations between January and December 2025, based on systematic monitoring of reports from 54 media organisations.
The report, titled Silenced Voices, Shrinking Space: Civic Freedoms Under Pressure, found that state actors were involved in 219 of the 245 incidents, with the Nigeria Police Force linked to 118 of those cases.
The violations covered more than attacks on journalists alone. They included restrictions affecting citizens, journalists and broader democratic participation, with arrests, detention, harassment and other administrative, legal and institutional measures among the documented forms of infringement.
The report recorded 145 non-violent incidents, representing 59.2 per cent of the total. Arrests accounted for 49 of those cases, while detention accounted for 21 and harassment for 15.
The findings also highlighted difficult working conditions for journalists, with stakeholders raising concerns about threats from state actors, politicians and political party agents.
Participants at a stakeholder dialogue accompanying the report’s presentation also pointed to low pay, insecure employment and economic dependence within parts of the media industry as factors that can weaken journalists’ ability to resist pressure and report independently.
A separate 2025 annual report by Media Rights Agenda documented 86 incidents involving attacks against journalists, media organisations and freedom of expression rights across 27 states and the Federal Capital Territory.
The report recorded arrests and detention as the most common form of violation, with 38 cases. It also documented 21 cases of assault and battery, as well as two killings, one involving a journalist who was killed in the line of duty.
The Nigeria Police Force was identified as the alleged perpetrator in 41 of the 86 cases recorded by Media Rights Agenda, accounting for nearly half of the incidents in its dataset. The organisation also said none of the documented cases resulted in a successful investigation or prosecution of perpetrators.
The wider picture is also reflected in international press freedom assessments. Reporters Without Borders currently describes Nigeria as one of West Africa’s most dangerous and difficult countries for journalists, citing monitoring, attacks and arbitrary arrests. Its 2026 World Press Freedom Index placed Nigeria 112th out of 180 countries, compared with 122nd in 2025.
The Committee to Protect Journalists has similarly documented arrests, attacks and harassment involving journalists in Nigeria. In a 2026 letter to President Bola Tinubu, the organisation said it had documented numerous cases of journalists being detained and mistreated, while also citing data from Nigerian press freedom organisations.
The WSCIJ report warned that the pressure on civic space has implications beyond individual journalists, as restrictions on expression and public participation can weaken accountability and democratic engagement.