Connect with us

Banking

Energy Experts Reject World Bank Fuel Import Plan

Published

on

Energy

Energy experts reject World Bank fuel import plan, warning it could weaken Nigeria’s refining drive and energy security goals

The Nigerian petroleum and energy sector , witnessed a sharp policy clash as petroleum marketers and industry experts in Lagos and Abuja rejected a World Bank recommendation urging Nigeria to reopen its borders for the importation of Premium Motor Spirit, popularly known as petrol.

Also read: Nigeria Becomes Key Energy Import Partner for India

The World Bank had, in its Nigeria Development Update released on April 7, advised Nigeria to prioritise fuel imports on the grounds that imported petrol could be cheaper than locally refined products.

The position, however, quickly triggered widespread backlash across the downstream oil sector, with stakeholders warning it could destabilise Nigeria’s emerging refining ecosystem.

Petroleum Products Retail Outlets Owners Association of Nigeria, Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, and energy analysts were among those who strongly opposed the proposal, arguing that it runs counter to Nigeria’s ongoing efforts to strengthen domestic refining capacity.

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, through its Chief Executive Officer, Dr Muda Yusuf, described the recommendation as counterproductive, stressing that Nigeria must focus on long term industrial stability rather than short term import dependence.

A major turning point followed when the World Bank reportedly deleted the initial report from its platform and clarified that its recommendation was not intended as an outright endorsement of fuel importation.

The institution explained that its broader objective was centred on consumer protection and social welfare support mechanisms.

Energy analysts further warned that increasing reliance on imports at a time of global supply instability, driven by geopolitical tensions affecting major oil producing regions, could expose Nigeria to external shocks and price volatility.

They argued that such vulnerability would undermine recent gains recorded in local refining and downstream reforms.

Speaking on the controversy, energy expert Dr Tim Okon questioned the influence of external financial institutions on domestic policy direction, describing the recommendation as unnecessary and cautioning against over reliance on foreign policy prescriptions.

In contrast, a minority position emerged from the Petroleum Products Retail Outlets Owners Association of Nigeria, which supported liberalised import access, arguing it could enhance competition and efficiency in the downstream market.

However, most stakeholders aligned with Nigeria’s emerging “Nigeria First” industrial policy direction, championed by the Federal Government, which prioritises domestic production and consumption of refined petroleum products.

Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria President, Abubakar Maigandi, reinforced opposition to fuel importation, insisting that Nigeria must prioritise local refining capacity, particularly support for domestic facilities such as the Dangote Refinery.

He stated that imported fuel would undermine local investment and weaken economic stability, adding that Nigeria already possesses sufficient crude resources to sustain domestic refining.

Also read: Lagos Government Advances Clean Energy Drive to Boost Growth

Stakeholders collectively maintained that strengthening local refining infrastructure remains the most sustainable path to energy security, price stability, and long term economic resilience, urging policymakers to remain focused on domestic production reforms rather than reopening import dependency.

70 / 100 SEO Score

Banking

Wema Bank Faults NDIC’s Claims on Legacy Transactions Involving Defunct Gulf Bank Plc

Published

on

By

Wema Bank Plc has noted with concern recent media publications containing false, misleading, and wholly unsubstantiated allegations regarding the sale of certain Banana Island properties purportedly linked to the defunct Gulf Bank Plc. We unequivocally reject these claims, which are inaccurate, malicious, and clearly intended to distort the true position. For the benefit of our stakeholders—shareholders, customers, regulators, and the general public—we set out below the factual background to the transaction.

The Original Exposure and Default
In 2002, Wema Bank Plc (the Bank) made an inter-bank placement with Gulf Bank Plc in the sum of ₦4.6 billion. By August 2004, that exposure had been reduced to approximately ₦1.2 billion, after which the outstanding obligation became delinquent. In seeking to recover depositors’ and shareholders’ funds, Wema Bank pursued lawful recovery steps, which ultimately dovetailed into a criminal investigation of the then Managing Director of Gulf Bank Plc.

Based on the investigation of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the funds were found to have been diverted and used to acquire properties in Banana Island, Lagos, through two separate companies Bacad Finance & Investment Company Ltd (now known as Supra Commercial Trust Limited) and Euston Wenberg Eng Ltd. It is important to note that neither Bacad Finance & Investment Company Ltd (nor its successor, Supra Commercial Trust Limited) nor Euston Wenberg Eng Ltd is one and the same as Gulf Bank Plc. They are separate and distinct entities with no identity or equivalence to Gulf Bank. And the two companies are not subject to NDIC supervision.

In the course of its investigation, the EFCC conducted asset-tracing exercises that uncovered significant underlying fraud on a substantial scale. Following the EFCC’s findings, Bacad Finance & Investment Company Ltd and Euston Wenberg Eng Ltd voluntarily relinquished their proprietary interests in the Banana Island properties towards the satisfaction of Gulf Bank Indebtedness to Wema Bank. That process formed part of Wema Bank’s lawful recovery efforts and underscores the legitimacy of its actions against Gulf Bank.

NDIC’s Acknowledgment, Admission of Indebtedness, and Payment of Shortfall.
Critically, following the liquidation of Gulf Bank, Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) admitted Gulf Bank’s indebtedness to Wema Bank in two separate letters:
A letter dated September 26, 2007, addressed to the Federal Land Registry; and
A letter dated June 10, 2009, addressed directly to Wema Bank Plc.
These letters constitute clear and formal recognition by the NDIC of the validity of Wema Bank’s claim against the defunct Gulf Bank and its interest over the property in question. Fortunately, both letters form part of the documents frontloaded by NDIC lawyer Dr. Dada Awosika SAN in court in the ongoing proceedings before Justice Allagoa of the Federal High Court Lagos.

Furthermore, after the sale of the properties, the NDIC in fact paid to Wema Bank, the shortfall of what was due to the Bank. These facts demonstrate that the NDIC was not only aware of the transaction but actively participated in settling the outstanding balance following the sale.

In light of the foregoing:
the voluntary relinquishment by Bacad (now Supra Commercial Trust Limited) and Euston Wenberg (distinct entities not constituting Gulf Bank), of the properties in Banana Island for the settlement of the indebtedness of the defunct Gulf Bank

the NDIC’s formal admission of Gulf Bank’s indebtedness to Wema Bank via its letters of September 26, 2007 (to the Federal Land Registry) and June 10, 2009 (to Wema Bank), both of which have been frontloaded in court by NDIC itself, and the acknowledgement of the relinquishment of the Banana Island properties, and the NDIC’s own payment of the shortfall to Wema Bank,

NDIC is precluded from and cannot in good faith contest the relinquishment of those interests or the appropriateness of Wema Bank’s recovery efforts.

While we acknowledge that the NDIC has recently commenced two separate actions against Wema Bank at the Federal High Court, Lagos, purportedly in its capacity as liquidator of Gulf Bank Plc pursuant to a winding-up order, those proceedings do not alter the material facts stated above. As these matters are currently before the court and therefore sub judice, Wema Bank will refrain from commenting further on issues that fall for judicial determination. The Bank is taking all necessary steps to contest the suits filed in court and will explore all legal and legitimate means to protect its rights and interests.

Conclusion

Wema Bank Plc remains steadfast in its commitment to the highest standards of corporate governance, regulatory compliance, and transparency. We reaffirm our dedication to ethical and prudent banking practices and assure our shareholders, customers, regulators, and all relevant stakeholders that the Bank will continue to act responsibly, lawfully, and in the best interests of all parties it serves. The Bank will continue to exert its rights and will not succumb to the shenanigans of unscrupulous individuals who want to reap where they did not sow.

42 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Banking

Wema Bank Unveils N170m 5for5 Reward Scheme Season Five

Published

on

Wema Bank

Wema Bank has launched Season Five of its 5for5 reward scheme with over N170m in prizes to promote digital banking and inclusion (more…)

75 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Banking

Access Holdings Risks Dividend Suspension Amid Regulatory Pressure

Published

on

Access

Access Holdings dividend suspension risk rises as regulators flag excess foreign investments, potentially delaying payouts in H1 2026

(more…)

65 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Trending News