Connect with us

Opinion

Facebook vs ARCON: Presidential Aide O’tega Ogra Got It Wrong And Should Not Drag Presidency Into Murky Waters

Published

on

Facebook

By Ewa Izuchukwu

adron lemon friday

 

It was barely weeks after my honest review that raised questions about Justice Bogoro’s judgment setting aside ARCON’s ₦60 billion notice against Facebook Nigeria, when I got a rejoinder from a surprising and an unexpected source.

Also read: Facebook Nigeria vs ARCON’s judgment: Not about fine but consumer protection at risk of vulnerability

It’s not from Facebook Nigeria, not from Meta’s regional or global policy office, but from our own O’tega Ogra, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Digital Communications, Engagement and New Media Strategy. His piece, “The Facebook Nigeria Judgment Is Not a Defeat for Consumers. It Is a Victory for the Rule of Law,” summarily argues that the ruling strengthens institutional discipline rather than weaken consumer protection.

Ordinarily, public debate is healthy. Counter-arguments strengthen democratic discourse. But before engaging the substance of Ogra’s arguments, there is an important question that deserve serious considerations, answers: why has a presidential aide become the most visible public defender of a judgment obtained by Meta when the company itself has chosen silence?

Ogra’s writer profile at the end of the rejoinder discloses that he is also Vice President of the Association of Advertisers in Nigeria (ADVAN) and a member of the governing council of the World Federation of Advertisers.

Those are legitimate affiliations. But again, is he speaking as the President’s communications adviser? As an ADVAN executive? Or simply as a private citizen exercising his right to free expression?

The distinction matters because each role carries different responsibilities. When a senior presidential spokesman publicly champions a position that substantially aligns with the interests of a multinational technology company in litigation against a regulatory agency, perceptions matter as much as intentions.

Whatever he intended, the impression created is that the Presidency through its Ogra its spokesman has entered a dispute against a federal government agency. That is an impression no presidential aide should willingly create.

Interestingly, while ADVAN has maintained its longstanding disagreements with ARCON over ongoing advertising industry reforms, its President, Osamede Uwubanmwen, and its Board of Trustees Chairman, Aare Fatai Odeshile have appeared to be relatively restrained in publicly prosecuting this latest chapter of that disagreement. Instead, Ogra has emerged as the new ADVAN spokesman on industry matters.

Whether by design or circumstance, he now appears to be carrying the public argument that others within the association have largely avoided. That should concern him.

A presidential spokesman should be careful not to blur the distinction between public office and negative industry issues, particularly on matters where government itself has a direct stake through one of its regulatory agency.

The Office of the President should not be perceived as attacking a regulatory agency in the media or championing foreign interests ahead of national and consumer interests.

Is this really something to celebrate?

Setting personalities and motives aside and examining Ogra’s main claim, the court did not shield Meta from the law, only that ARCON failed to prove Facebook Nigeria’s relationship to Meta with admissible evidence rather than commercial assumption. But look at what proving that relationship “properly” actually requires in practice.

In the earlier related Abuja suit FHC/ABJ/CS/1701/2022, filed in September 2022, ARCON had gone the route Ogra says the law demands. It sued Meta Platforms Incorporated directly, and on 30 March 2023 the court granted leave to issue and serve the originating summons on Meta in the United States!

If that is what “doing it properly” looks like, then the rule of law Ogra is celebrating is one that only a well-resourced regulator, or a well-resourced litigant, can actually afford to invoke.

An ordinary Nigerian consumer deceived through advertising on Facebook cannot realistically litigate against Meta in California or Delaware. So while lawyers may applaud procedural purity, consumers are left asking a simpler question: who protects us?

Consumer protection is not exclusive to one regulator

It is disappointing that as a senior presidential aide, Ogra does not know that all government agencies have overlapping functions and all government regulatory agencies have consumer protection as their primary mandate, and that is why he would argue that ARCON is not Nigeria’s consumer protection regulator and that this responsibility belongs to the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC).

Government agencies routinely enforce laws within their respective sectors where consumer welfare is implicated. NAFDAC prosecutes misleading advertisements relating to regulated products.

The Central Bank intervenes where financial promotions breach banking regulations. The Securities and Exchange Commission acts against unlawful investment promotions.

The Nigerian Communications Commission protects telecommunications subscribers. None of these agencies declines responsibility simply because the FCCPC also has consumer protection powers.

In fact, quite recently, the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) recently secured the conviction of a social media content creator for promoting cannabis online.

The court sentenced him to seven years’ imprisonment after finding him guilty under the NDLEA Act for using social media to advertise cannabis products.

The NDLEA did not conclude that because the offending conduct involved advertising, it should wait for ARCON to act. Nor did it argue that advertising regulation fell exclusively within another regulator’s jurisdiction.

It acted because the offence touched directly on its statutory mandate. That is how sectoral regulation works. Government agencies exercise powers within their enabling laws, even where those powers intersect with advertising, consumer welfare or public safety.

The evidentiary bar Ogra defends is not the one Nigerian courts actually apply

Ogra insists that “commercial reality and legal proof are not always the same thing,” and that courts cannot repair a regulator’s evidentiary gaps. That would be a stronger argument if our courts had, in fact, been applying that standard consistently. They have not.

In January, a Lagos High Court in Femi Falana, SAN v. Meta Platforms Inc. held Meta liable as a joint data controller for content on Facebook without requiring Falana to first construct an elaborate paper trail proving Meta’s ownership and control of the platform; the relationship was treated as established fact, because it plainly is.

The Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal reached a $220 million judgment against “Meta Platforms Incorporated (Facebook) and WhatsApp LLC” jointly on the same basis.

Our law also already possesses a doctrine built for exactly this situation, which is piercing the corporate veil, applied by the Supreme Court in Marina Nominees Ltd v. Federal Board of Inland Revenue to look behind a company shown to be acting as another’s agent, and invoked whenever, per Oyebanji v. State, a corporate form is used to dupe or evade.

None of these courts demanded that a claimant first litigate Meta’s corporate structure from scratch. Only Justice Bogoro’s court did. If Otegra’s “rule of law” means anything, it should mean consistency… the same platform, the same country, should not be a proven data controller in one courtroom and a legal stranger to its own product in another.

As referenced in my earlier piece, Nigeria is not the first place Meta has reached for corporate separateness as a shield, and Ogra’s “burden of proof” framing collapses when set against how other courts have treated the identical argument.

In Kenya, Meta spent years insisting it could not be held responsible for Facebook content moderators because they were technically employed by an outsourcing contractor, Sama; Kenya’s employment court rejected that, and the Court of Appeal upheld the rejection, holding that Meta was the real employer because the moderators did Meta’s work under Meta’s control.

In Australia, Facebook Inc argued in litigation brought by the country’s privacy regulator that only its Irish affiliate, not Facebook Inc itself, conducted business in Australia; the Full Federal Court rejected that, and separately refused Facebook Inc’s own attempt to escape service of the very kind of cross-border process Ogra treats as an unavoidable technicality here.

Ireland’s Data Protection Commission, dealing with the very corporate architecture Meta uses to route around accountability, fined the Irish subsidiary itself €1.2 billion rather than accepting that the structure shielded anyone.

In each of these markets, courts and regulators found a way to hold the platform to account without first demanding a documentary trail that, in practice, only Meta’s own internal filings could ever fully. Indeed, Nigeria’s outcome is the outlier, not the norm.

Mr. Ogra ends his article by urging ADVAN to help foster reconciliation between advertisers and regulators.

That would have been commendable had ADVAN not spent years engaged in legal confrontation with ARCON over issues bordering on regulatory authority.

Let me stop here by emphasizing that the larger issue is no longer whether the presidential aide is entitled to his opinion. Every Nigerian enjoys that right.

The real issue is whether he should be the one leading what increasingly appears to be an industry campaign against a statutory agency of the same Federal Government he has been appointed to serve.

If Mr. Ogra wishes to be the public face of ADVAN’s long-running disagreements with ARCON, that is entirely his prerogative. But public office comes with obligations that demand restraint, neutrality and an acute awareness of perception.

The Office of the President should never be seen, rightly or wrongly, as taking sides in a dispute involving one of its own regulatory agencies and a multinational corporation.

That is why Mr. Ogra should reflect carefully on the implications of his intervention. If he believes so strongly in ADVAN’s cause that he intends to become one of its principal public advocates in its continuing contest with ARCON, then the honourable course would be to first relinquish his role as Senior Special Assistant to the President.

He cannot effectively wear the hat of a presidential spokesman while simultaneously projecting himself as a leading voice in a battle that pits an industry association against an agency of the Federal Government.

This is more so as every response directed at him in this matter inevitably risks being interpreted as a response to the Presidency itself.

That serves neither President Bola Tinubu, whose office ought to remain above such industry disputes, nor the integrity of government institutions.

Also read: Facebook Nigeria vs ARCON’s judgment: Not about fine but consumer protection at risk of vulnerability

Public confidence is not strengthened when a presidential aide appears to be publicly undermining one regulator while defending the legal victory of a private multinational company.

75 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Tributes to Dr. Segun Osoba and Abosede Oluwayemisi

Published

on

Dr. Segun Osoba

By Bola BOLAWOLE, 

adron lemon friday

Dr. Segun Osoba, Marxist scholar and historian, was one of my mentors and role models. Our paths crossed long before I came face-to-face with the enigma at the then University of Ife, now Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, where he not only taught me courses in the History department, but was also our staff adviser and comrade.

Also read: When Port Harcourt hosted Wole Soyinka

Cerebral and unflinchingly principled, Osoba snubbed the usual hussle, if I may call it that, of many academics to attain to the professoral status, preferring to remain “Dr.” even though everyone knew he was not the mate of many a professor!

For me, Osoba’s fame travelled far ahead of him. Appointed by the Murtala Muhammed regime into the Constitution Drafting Committee in October 1975, Osoba, together with his ideological soulmate, Dr. Bala Usman of the History department of the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, broke ranks with the other members of the CDC to author a people-oriented draft Constitution that made the Nigerian people’s interests, aspirations and well-being its focal point. It was termed the Minority Report.

Expectedly, the conservative Olusegun Obasanjo regime that succeeded Murtala Muhammed rejected the Osoba/Bala Usman report while accepting the report of the majority members of the CDC on September 14, 1976. The CDC was chaired by Chief FRA Williams.

The majority/minority report divide apart, the CDC was not without its controversies: The sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, had declined to serve on the committee, thereby reducing its members from 50 to 49. There was also the debate as to what would have been the choice of a much more radical Murtala Muhammed had he not been assassinated on February 13, 1976.

Specifically because of Osoba and Bala Usman, I chose to study History in the university! And I was fortunate to drink from the fountain of knowledge at the feet of Dr. Osoba on and off the classroom. As comrades, our relationship did not end at Ife; usually, comradeship is a life-long endeavour.

In late December 2023, after a spell of ‘long-time-no-see’, four of us old students/comrades of Comrade Osoba decided to visit him at his Ijebu-Ode residence – Femi Falana, SAN; Ambassador Ayo Olukanni; Kayode Komolafe (K.K.) and my humble self.

Comrade was still his very sharp and humorous self. Despite his health challenges, he still “recognised” each and everyone of us by our voice. We discussed for hours and it was amazing that ill-health spared his intellect. He was his familiar self – analytical, even if caustic, going down memory lane and recalling facts and figures as if he was reading them from a book spread out before him.

We promised to return. Unfortunately, we procrastinated, despite Olukanni’s repeated prodding. But as individuals, we attended his 90th birthday celebration held at Ijebu-Ode on 9th January, 2025. His book, “Critical and Contentious Issues in the Modern and Contemporary History of Nigeria: Collected Writings of Samuel Olusegun Osoba”, which was unveiled at the occasion, adorns my Library. See also my “Tributes to Comrade (Dr.) Segun Osoba at 90”, published in this column in the Wednesday, 15 January, 2025 edition of the New Telegraph newspaper.

Dr. Osoba passed away peacefully at home in Ijebu-Ode on 14 May, 2026. A flurry of activities by comrades from all the nooks and crannies of this country as well as abroad celebrated his life, extolled his virtues, pledged to continue the struggle from where he stopped, and bid him farewell from this earthly plane. In this were the words of Che Guevara fulfilled: “Wherever death may surprise us, let it be welcome, provided that this, our battle cry, may have reached some receptive ear and another hand may be extended to wield our weapons (Message to the Tricontinental, 1967).”

I was unable to participate fully in some of the activities because of the tragedy that fell at my doorsteps at about the same time.

First, my elder sister’s husband, Gabriel Alani Olusola Omiyale, died on June 11, 2026 at the age of 89 years. He was a mentor. Then came the bombshell: His daughter – and my sister’s second child, Abosede Oluwayemisi – died the same month on June 29th at the age of 54!

That was massive! To say we were devastated is an understatement. If the pains that attended Bose’s death remain indescribable, the ways and manners of her husband and his family immediately before and after her death remain a puzzle. They rubbed insults on our injury.

They desecrated our Yoruba customs and traditions. Bose had heroically battled the scourge of breast cancer; after undergoing an operation, we were all optimistic she was on the path to full recovery until tests showed she needed more medical attention.

Naturally, she was devastated but, gradually, she built up the confidence and strength required to see her through. No stone was left unturned by her extended family who did not leave the load for the husband and his family to carry. All hands were on deck.

The extended family had always been there for Bose. Her siblings had been wonderful; never allowing her husband’s unstable job situation to show or affect Bose’s treatment and other needs, including her children’s education and welfare. I also played my part. I am grateful to everyone who responded to our clarion call in many ways.

We were hopeful we would all pull through it and that Bose’s case would be another testimony that cancer can be beaten. All she needed – as much as medicare – were words of encouragement and support. That, however, became the weakest link!

Act one: Against the best advice of her mother, my niece was made to consume a concoction that turned the tide. According to her husband, the concoction was procured by his own brother in Akure, Ondo state, taken to a church for prayers after which it was dispatched through a motorpark! Bose drank this concoction and started vomiting. In his own testimonies, Bose’s husband took her to a hospital where she was given drips, which gave her some strength, but because the doctor was late in coming, he took her back home despite the fact that the test they ran indicated that she had a blood infection! That night at home, she started vomiting again and, according to the husband’s testimony, he took her again to the hospital by 1.30am. She was left unattended until late afternoon when she fell into a coma! Bose’s blood infection was never treated until she passed away!

Act Two: Our standard practice had been to always double-check whatever a doctor said or prescribed, but on this fatal day, Bose’s husband kept all of us in the dark. We were not told of the blood infection. We were not alerted when she started vomiting again in the night. We were not informed when he took her again to the hospital. According to him, Bose walked with her own legs into the hospital, climbing the row of stairs all by herself.

Act Three: At the hospital, the husband took Bose’s phone and locked it in the car parked downstairs. So she had no access to her phone – to call out or receive in-coming calls. She was held incommunicado. And there was no one else there with the husband and wife. He called noone; he also snubbed repeated incoming calls into his own phone, including from my elder sister, who is Bose’s mother.

Act four: Later that afternoon, the husband called me to say Bose was not responding to treatment and that I should start interceding for her. I was aghast! I had been waiting all day for them to link up with me for a scheduled appointment. Later, a female voice using the husband’s phone called me to quickly come to the hospital. I was on my way there when Bose’s second child, a girl writing exams at the Obafemi Awolowo University, called me, sobbing! “Daddy, what is happening to my Mom? My Daddy called me and said my Mummy is in coma” Coma! “Yes, sir”, the girl replied, “and my Daddy said my Mummy is dead!” I almost lost control of the wheel because I was driving.

Act Five: On getting to the hospital, they had already started embalming Bose! I screamed at the husband, but the hospital staff restrained me. Why the haste? Without any of her family members present! A thousand thoughts ran riot in my head. At 6.28 pm, Bose’s mortal remains were deposited in the morgue and we left.

Act Six: While we were agonizing about how to break the sad news to Bose’s mother, her husband and his family had posted Bose’s death on every conceivable social media platform, breaking the news to her young children, the oldest of whom is just a little over 20 years while the youngest is 14!

Act seven: We the siblings of Bose’s mother wanted a decent burial for her. We wanted her dreams and visions for her children respected. Bose’s husband and his family spurned all of that! They weaponized Bose’s young children against us. They threw their so-called customs and traditions in our face at every turn – as if the Yoruba have no customs and traditions. They employed deceit and subterfuge and hurriedly committed Bose to mother earth without any of her family members present! We warned! They ignored and played games!

Google says Edema is a name answered by both the Urhobo and Itsekiri people of Delta state. Does their culture permit the trumping of Yoruba customs and traditions? Should a husband boast to his children – while their mother was still battling cancer – that, if she dies, he will remarry? So, expect his wedding invitation!

Also read: When Port Harcourt hosted Wole Soyinka

Had Bose died of cancer, our pains would have been less insufferable; but she did not! Were they tired of the stress and wanted closure so they could move on with their own life? Hastened to her death! Hurried to the grave! This is to put the records straight. Our immediate attention, however, is the good health of Bose’s mother – and Daddy Omiyale’s burial slated for 29th and 30th of October this year.

Let Dr. Segun Osoba rest in power! And eternal rest grant Abosede Oluwayemisi Edema (nee Omiyale), O Lord!

 

(Published in the TREASURES column on the back page of the Wednesday, 5 August, 2026 edition of the New Telegraph newspaper).

57 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Opinion

When Port Harcourt hosted Wole Soyinka

Published

on

Port Harcourt

By Dr. Sam Akpe,

adron lemon friday

The hall wore a robe of expectations as minutes ticked towards the hour. The city was wrapped in the mood of impending festivity. Something was in the air. Road safety personnel and armed policemen were on duty—directing traffic and maintaining orderliness along Woji Road.

Also read: Team Nigeria’s Historic Commonwealth Games Campaign: How DG Olopade executed hitch free competition

A walk into the event hall felt like an excursion into a carnival. From the urbane music equipment emitting jazzy tunes, to the symmetrically-arranged seats, the arty wall decorations, and the storybook backdrop, poetry was on display.

Outside, directly opposite the car park, a massive poster announcing the event in the making—the Annual Wole Soyinka Lecture with a life-size portrait of the literary legend—exhibited what was about to unfold.

The imposing poster also indicated two other persons—the technocrat extraordinaire, Chief Ndutimi Alaibe, as chairman of the day, while the former Aviation and Aerospace Development Minister, Chief Osita Chidoka—was the guest speaker.

Indeed, almost the entire Port Harcourt—a city of political frenzy, soaked in oily wealth but surrounded by shantytowns—was in colourful feel of expectancy, as it awaited the arrival of Akinwande Oluwole Babatunde Soyinka, Africa’s first Nobel Laureate in Literature.

Then almost surreptitiously, the literary idol walked into the hall unannounced. Except for his traditional white hair, the big smile, and the hawk-like penetrating eyes, the hall almost missed his entry. Eventually, everyone rose in honour of the reverential figure—the father of modern political literature.

The 92-years old, with a deep voice, was in the city not just to attend a lecture in his honour, but to participate in a highbrow yearly ritual of the National Association of Seadogs, also called Pyrates Confraternity—a body of intellectual militants founded by him several decades ago.

It turned out to be quite an explosive event. Chairman of the summit, Chief Ndutimi Alaibe, known simply as ‘Timi, paid extensive tributes Wole Soyinka before setting the tone for the lecture that triggered off wide-ranging discussions.

‘Timi told the audience that Nigeria is immeasurably better today because of people like Soyinka who, throughout his remarkable journey, has consistently chosen the harder path—the path of conscience, courage, and truth—when silence could have been safer, easier, and far more rewarding to him.

Labelling the scholarly sage as a man with generosity of spirit and loyalty to friends, he applauded Soyinka’s readiness to encourage worthy causes, and the extraordinary willingness to show up whenever principle, rather than prominence was needed.

He declared, “Today, we honour you not merely with words, but with our presence and our shared commitment to engage the very questions your life has posed to our nation for more than six decades—questions of justice, accountability, freedom, and the moral courage required to build a truly democratic society.”

Besides, the lecture, the event was also a celebration of those described as the National Association of Seadogs Martyrs—a group comprising members of the confraternity arrested on February 17, 1997, imprisoned and tortured by the military in Rivers State on accusation of undue radicalism.

Their ordeal, which lasted 72 days, stated Dr Joseph Oteri, the confraternity leader, was an unplanned journey into the darkest hell of the late General Sani Abacha’s regime, “for daring to believe that Nigeria deserved better than the boot of a dictator,” until they were freed by a court of law.

‘Timi noted that the arrest and prosecution of the Pyrates was basically “for refusing to be silent in the face of oppression” describing the victims as “enduring symbols of resilience and civil courage in the struggle for the restoration of democracy and the rule of law.”

He said the anniversary of the event reminded everyone that democracy not freely bestowed; but was won through the sacrifices of countless Nigerians –many celebrated, many unsung—who endured intimidation, persecution and personal loss in defence of freedom, justice and accountable governance.

Going down memory lane, he mentioned other martyrs of democracy to include “Dele Giwa, whose fearless journalism challenged military authoritarianism until it claimed his life, Ken Saro-Wiwa and the Ogoni Nine, whose martyrdom awakened the world’s conscience to environmental justice and human rights, Kudirat Abiola, whose courage sustained the struggle to reclaim a stolen democratic mandate.

“We remember Chief Alfred Rewane, whose unwavering commitment to democracy cost him his life. And we remember Chief Bola Ige, Nigeria’s former Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, whose assassination remains, to our enduring national shame, unresolved.”

Then he added: “Whether through imprisonment or assassination, torture or intimidation, these men and women bore heavy personal burdens so that future generations might live under the rule of law rather than the rule of fear.

“Their stories remind us that civil courage is not an abstract ideal. It is rather the willingness to stand for what is right, even when the consequences are severe and deadly.

“As we honour their memories today, may we also recommit ourselves to completing the work for which they sacrificed so much—building a Nigeria founded on justice, accountability, constitutional governance and respect for the dignity of every citizen.”

The hall sat in silence, except for intermittent applauses and fulfilled smiles from Soyinka as ‘Timi recalled rare moments of encounter with the erudite professor several years ago—a part of four decades of relationship that has profoundly shaped his understanding of what Soyinka means to Nigeria.

He mentioned an instance of close interaction in 2006 when, under the auspices of the Commission of Nobel Laureates, Soyinka was part of an international mission that visited the Niger Delta to promote peaceful dialogue and undertake a fact-finding exercise in the region—including a visit to the Niger Delta Development Commission, where ‘Timi served.

He recalled that after listening to their presentation, Soyinka remarked that the NDDC had taken on an enormous burden on behalf of a beleaguered region and deserved to be remembered as one of the positive initiatives of the Obasanjo administration, adding with characteristic generosity, “I will remember to commend him when next I see him.”  

Two years later, ‘Timi’s late wife, Alaere, extended an invitation to the revered literary czar who was then in the United States, immersed in an exceptionally demanding schedule, to visit ‘Timi’s village of Igbainwari in Opokuma, Bayelsa State, to inaugurate the Wole Soyinka Library—an initiative of Alaere’s organisation, Family Reorientation, Education and Empowerment (FREE).

He revealed that what made that visit even more remarkable was that Soyinka “did not merely fly in to perform a ceremonial duty and depart. He chose to spend the night in our modest country home in that remote riverine community.

“For a man of such global stature—a Nobel Laureate whose voice commanded respect across continents—it was an extraordinary act of humility. Let me add that he also tried Izon local brew.

“By his presence, he honoured not only our family but also an entire community that had long felt disregarded, affirming that no place is too small, and no people too insignificant, to deserve dignity, learning, and hope.

“He spoke with genuine admiration of my late wife’s vision, courage, and steadfast determination, recognising in her work a powerful testament to what conviction and selfless service can accomplish. He said ‘I am not often impressed with people, but she has succeeded in impressing me with her drive, her vision and her total commitment.’”

‘Timi noted that Soyinka created more impact during that visit when he spoke to the youth of the Niger Delta whose militancy at that time had emerged as one of the defining challenges confronting the Niger Delta.

Soyinka offered a wise counsel urging them to choose dialogue over violence and a future built on peace, not conflict.

With characteristic moral clarity, he challenged them to embrace “intellectual militancy in pursuit of the region’s development—a powerful call to exchange the force of weapons for the power of ideas, knowledge, and constructive engagement.”

By his confession, ‘Timi’s reminiscences were not merely out of nostalgia, but because they spoke directly to the event of the day, or as he put it, long before “reclaiming the state” became a familiar phrase, Soyinka was already living it’s meaning.

Or how would you describe a man of Soyinka’s standing journeying to a remote community which many considered too insignificant to matter, just to inaugurate a library and spend a night among strangers without ceremony or pretence, in an environment of budding militancy—with violence on parade.

Soyinka’s act simply affirmed that the true measure of leadership is not the distance one travels, but the willingness to stand with people wherever they are. ‘Timi described this as principled leadership and accountability exercised with wisdom and humility.

On the of the theme: “Reclaiming the Nigerian State through Accountability, Justice and Civil Courage” the former managing director of NDDC said it speaks directly to the realities of the Nigeria—a country we inhabit and the nation we aspire to build.

His words: “Nigeria is blessed with extraordinary human talent, abundant natural resources and remarkable resilience. Yet we continue to fall short of our collective potential. Our national challenge has never been a lack of diagnosis; it has been a failure to act consistently on what we already know.”

It was his view that too often, the institutions designed to hold power accountable have been weakened, thus making justice, for many Nigerians, a privilege rather than their inalienable right.

Restating the virtues of the confraternity, he said: “This gathering cannot, in good conscience, speak of reclaiming the Nigerian state without confronting one of the cardinal evils that the National Association of Seadogs was founded to repudiate.”

That evil, called tribalism, has birthed partisanship, clannishness, ethnic chauvinism and statism, while the enduring values of nationalism, absolute honesty, absolute selflessness, and love for all have been neglected, said ‘Timi.

He asserted that, tribalism has become less an individual prejudice than a systemic condition, coursing through Nigeria’s national bloodstream and eating away at the very fabric of our society.

He noted that reclaiming the Nigerian state must therefore begin with reclaiming ourselves—by ensuring that the principles we so proudly profess are applied consistently, without fear or favour, irrespective of tribe, political affiliation, or the identity of those who wield power.

Ultimately, he said, “accountability is sustained not by laws alone but by the courage of men and women who insist that those laws apply equally to the powerful and the powerless.”

His position was that reclaiming the Nigerian state would not be achieved by a single dramatic event, but through the steady accumulation of principled choices by citizens who refuse to be indifferent, institutions that remain faithful to their mandates, and leaders who choose integrity over expediency and courage over convenience.

Falling back on his modest experience in public service, ‘Timi said the journey has reinforced one enduring lesson in him, that sustainable development cannot exist without accountability, and that where institutions are weak, hope gives way to cynicism; where accountability is upheld, even limited resources can produce lasting impact.

Also read: Team Nigeria’s Historic Commonwealth Games Campaign: How DG Olopade executed hitch free competition

He urged participants to see beyond the event of the day as they aim to rebuild Nigeria, knowing that “nations are not reclaimed by rhetoric alone,” rather, they are reclaimed “when conscience triumphs over convenience, when institutions are stronger than individuals, and when citizens summon the courage to do what is right, even when it is difficult.”

62 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Opinion

Team Nigeria’s Historic Commonwealth Games Campaign: How DG Olopade executed hitch free competition

Published

on

Team Nigeria

By seun oloketuyi 

adron lemon friday

 

When the 2026 Commonwealth Games came to an end in Glasgow, Scotland, Team Nigeria had every reason to celebrate.

Also read: Michelle Alozie Says Falcons Learned From Malawi Defeat

The athletes returned home with more than medals; they brought back a renewed sense of pride after producing one of the country’s finest performances at the Games.

Nigeria finished as the highest-ranked African nation, placing seventh overall with 24 medals: 10 gold, seven silver and seven bronze.

It was truly an outstanding campaign, marked by unforgettable performances, record-breaking achievements and moments that will be remembered for years to come.

For years, Nigeria’s participation at major international competitions was often overshadowed by stories of unpaid allowances, poor welfare and administrative challenges. Those issues frequently became part of the conversation before the competition had even begun.

This time, the story was different. Under the leadership of National Sports Commission Chairman Shehu Dikko and Director General Bukola Olopade, athlete welfare took centre stage. Preparations went smoothly and the usual distractions that had affected previous competitions were absent.

As a result, the athletes competed with confidence, knowing they had the support they needed. That confidence was reflected in their performances.

Nigeria’s first gold medal came through Esther Nworgu, who delivered an impressive performance in the women’s lightweight para powerlifting event to give Team Nigeria the perfect start.

One of the defining moments of the Games came from Goodness Nwachukwu, who won gold in the women’s F42 discus throw and, in the process, broke her own world record. It was one of Nigeria’s standout performances in Glasgow.

On the track, Ezekiel Nathaniel made history by becoming the first Nigerian man to win Commonwealth Games gold in the men’s 400m hurdles. His victory further highlighted Nigeria’s growing strength in athletics.

In the field events, Chukwuebuka Enekwechi added another historic achievement by winning Nigeria’s first ever Commonwealth Games gold medal in the men’s shot put, while Idris Riluwan continued the country’s dominance in para powerlifting with another gold medal-winning performance.

Although she was nursing an injury, Tobi Amusan refused to let that stop her from competing.

The world record holder battled through the pain to claim bronze in the women’s 100m hurdles, once again demonstrating the determination and resilience that have made her one of Nigeria’s finest athletes.

Nigeria’s success was not limited to these athletes. Samuel Ogazi won gold in the men’s 400m, Ruth Usoro secured silver in the women’s long jump, while medals in relay events and other disciplines highlighted the depth of talent within the Nigerian team.

By the end of the Games, Nigeria had not only finished as Africa’s top-performing nation but had also shown what is possible when athletes are given the right support.

The success in Glasgow was about more than medals. It demonstrated the importance of proper planning, athlete welfare and effective leadership.

With Shehu Dikko and Bukola Olopade providing an environment free from the administrative challenges that had often overshadowed previous competitions, the athletes were able to focus entirely on representing their country.

The result was a historic Commonwealth Games campaign that saw Team Nigeria break records, make history and reinforce its position as one of Africa’s leading sporting nations.

As the team returns from Scotland, the medals will rightly be celebrated. But Glasgow 2026 will also be remembered for showing what is possible when talented athletes receive the support they deserve.

Also read: Michelle Alozie Says Falcons Learned From Malawi Defeat

Team Nigeria’s performance was not just a victory on the medal table, it was proof that good leadership, proper preparation and unwavering determination can inspire excellence and bring honour to the nation.

69 / 100 SEO Score
Continue Reading

Trending News